Advancing Pap Smear Cytology: Effects of the Wash Technique on Sample Adequacy and Diagnostic Reliability

Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable cancers, yet many women still face delayed or missed diagnoses because of something as simple as an “unsatisfactory” Pap smear result. When a sample is reported as inadequate, often due to gel, blood, or inflammation, the patient may need to return for another test, creating anxiety, extra costs, and possible delays in detecting disease. To overcome this problem, laboratories have started using a simple but promising approach known as the wash technique. In this method, inadequate samples are gently rinsed in a mild acetic acid solution and reprocessed, allowing hidden cells to be recovered and reducing background debris. We retrospectively reviewed 645 Thin Prep Pap smears that underwent the wash protocol at King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital between 2020 and 2024. After reprocessing, 69.77% of cases were satisfactory, with 83.56% reported as NILM and 16.44% showing epithelial abnormalities, including ASC-US, LSIL, HSIL, and AGC. No squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma were detected. We conclude that the wash technique substantially improves Pap smear adequacy, salvaging the majority of initially unsatisfactory cases and enabling the detection of clinically relevant abnormalities. Unsatisfactory rates increased with advancing age, highlighting the need for age-aware approaches in cytology practice. Incorporating wash protocols into routine cytology practice may reduce repeat testing, minimize diagnostic delays, and strengthen the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pathology Research Reviews & Reports
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47363/jpr/2025(7)183
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Pap Smear Cytology: Effects of the Wash Technique on Sample Adequacy and Diagnostic Reliability

Abdulbasit Andijany, Abdulaziz M. Alghamdi, Esraa Baqhoum, Sheefa Kinkar et al.
Journal of Pathology Research Reviews & Reports
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Advancing Pap Smear Cytology: Effects of the Wash Technique on Sample Adequacy and Diagnostic Reliability

Abdulbasit Andijany, Abdulaziz M. Alghamdi, Esraa Baqhoum, Sheefa Kinkar, Albaraa Felemban, Turki Aljizani, Nouf Alqassimi, Noor Dammas
article en

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable cancers, yet many women still face delayed or missed diagnoses because of something as simple as an “unsatisfactory” Pap smear result. When a sample is reported as inadequate, often due to gel, blood, or inflammation, the patient may need to return for another test, creating anxiety, extra costs, and possible delays in detecting disease. To overcome this problem, laboratories have started using a simple but promising approach known as the wash technique. In this method, inadequate samples are gently rinsed in a mild acetic acid solution and reprocessed, allowing hidden cells to be recovered and reducing background debris. We retrospectively reviewed 645 Thin Prep Pap smears that underwent the wash protocol at King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital between 2020 and 2024. After reprocessing, 69.77% of cases were satisfactory, with 83.56% reported as NILM and 16.44% showing epithelial abnormalities, including ASC-US, LSIL, HSIL, and AGC. No squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma were detected. We conclude that the wash technique substantially improves Pap smear adequacy, salvaging the majority of initially unsatisfactory cases and enabling the detection of clinically relevant abnormalities. Unsatisfactory rates increased with advancing age, highlighting the need for age-aware approaches in cytology practice. Incorporating wash protocols into routine cytology practice may reduce repeat testing, minimize diagnostic delays, and strengthen the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs.

Journal of Pathology Research Reviews & Reports
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.