Evaluating the Performance of the National Water Model: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Streamflow Forecasting

The National Water Model (NWM)’s streamflow forecasts are widely used by stakeholders to make critical water management decisions. This study evaluates the performance of the NWM v2.1 in simulating streamflow across the Alabama Black Belt Region (ABBR), in the southeastern United States. Using retrospective NWM and USGS observed streamflow data, model performance was assessed across four-time scales—hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly—using three metrics: Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Root Mean Square Error Ratio (RSR), and Percent Bias (PBIAS). The results demonstrate that the NWM accuracy improves significantly with longer-term forecasts. At the monthly scale, 89% of evaluated stations reached above “Good” classification based on NSE (>0.75), and 85% based on RSR (<0.5). However, consistent negative bias was observed across all time scales, particularly in the underestimating flows. The results highlight the influence of environmental factors, including land use, topography, and soil characteristics, on model performance, as well as potential sources of systematic bias within the model’s processes. Although the NWM does not incorporate regulated protocols, its ability to capture flow variability improves at aggregated scales, suggesting its suitability for long-term planning applications. These findings underscore the need for further model structure refinement and regional calibration to enhance predictive reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17202950
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Performance of the National Water Model: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Streamflow Forecasting

Rubén Doria, Souleymane Fall, Joseph E. Quansah
2 citations
Water
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
article

Evaluating the Performance of the National Water Model: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Streamflow Forecasting

Rubén Doria, Souleymane Fall, Joseph E. Quansah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The National Water Model (NWM)’s streamflow forecasts are widely used by stakeholders to make critical water management decisions. This study evaluates the performance of the NWM v2.1 in simulating streamflow across the Alabama Black Belt Region (ABBR), in the southeastern United States. Using retrospective NWM and USGS observed streamflow data, model performance was assessed across four-time scales—hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly—using three metrics: Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Root Mean Square Error Ratio (RSR), and Percent Bias (PBIAS). The results demonstrate that the NWM accuracy improves significantly with longer-term forecasts. At the monthly scale, 89% of evaluated stations reached above “Good” classification based on NSE (>0.75), and 85% based on RSR (<0.5). However, consistent negative bias was observed across all time scales, particularly in the underestimating flows. The results highlight the influence of environmental factors, including land use, topography, and soil characteristics, on model performance, as well as potential sources of systematic bias within the model’s processes. Although the NWM does not incorporate regulated protocols, its ability to capture flow variability improves at aggregated scales, suggesting its suitability for long-term planning applications. These findings underscore the need for further model structure refinement and regional calibration to enhance predictive reliability.

WaterVol. 17(20)
Tuskegee University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.