Legal Implications of Wiretap Evidence in the Terrorism Investigation Process

Wiretapping evidence has an important role in the investigation process of terrorism, considering the nature of this crime which tends to be organized, secretive, and involves cross-regional networks. Wiretapping allows law enforcement officials to obtain information and evidence that cannot be accessed through conventional methods. This article discusses the position of wiretapping results in the investigation process, and the strength of wiretapping results in the investigation process. Based on applicable legal provisions, such as Law No. 19/2016 on the Amendment to Law No. 11/2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions and Law No. 5/2018 on the Eradication of the Criminal Acts of Terrorism, wiretapping is recognized as valid evidence provided that it is conducted based on a court order or special procedures regulated by law. However, its implementation faces various challenges, including potential violations of privacy rights, abuse of authority, and supervision of the wiretapping process. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of wiretapping evidence in supporting the investigation of terrorism crimes while highlighting the importance of balance between law enforcement and human rights protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lex journal kajian hukum dan keadilan
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v8i1.9362
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Implications of Wiretap Evidence in the Terrorism Investigation Process

Moh. Taufik, Renda Aranggraeni, Andre Khalil M. Putera Lato
Lex journal kajian hukum dan keadilan
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

Legal Implications of Wiretap Evidence in the Terrorism Investigation Process

Moh. Taufik, Renda Aranggraeni, Andre Khalil M. Putera Lato
article en

Abstract

Wiretapping evidence has an important role in the investigation process of terrorism, considering the nature of this crime which tends to be organized, secretive, and involves cross-regional networks. Wiretapping allows law enforcement officials to obtain information and evidence that cannot be accessed through conventional methods. This article discusses the position of wiretapping results in the investigation process, and the strength of wiretapping results in the investigation process. Based on applicable legal provisions, such as Law No. 19/2016 on the Amendment to Law No. 11/2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions and Law No. 5/2018 on the Eradication of the Criminal Acts of Terrorism, wiretapping is recognized as valid evidence provided that it is conducted based on a court order or special procedures regulated by law. However, its implementation faces various challenges, including potential violations of privacy rights, abuse of authority, and supervision of the wiretapping process. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of wiretapping evidence in supporting the investigation of terrorism crimes while highlighting the importance of balance between law enforcement and human rights protection.

Lex journal kajian hukum dan keadilanVol. 8(1)
Universitas Dr. Soetomo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.