One-Year Survival Following Surgical Management of Spinal Metastases

Abstract Background Metastatic spinal disease is a common complication of advanced cancer that causes pain, neurological deficits, and mechanical instability. Objective To identify factors associated with survival and motor function after surgery for spinal metastases. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 91 patients treated at a tertiary center (2016–2018). Variables included demographics, primary tumor, extraspinal disease, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), pre/postoperative motor function, procedure, and reoperations. Survival groups were < 60 days, 60 days–12 months, and ≥ 12 months. Associations were tested with univariable statistics (α = 0.05). Results Of 91 patients (56% male; mean age 62.4 ± 10.8 years), 74% underwent decompression and 78% stabilization. The primary tumor was unknown in 18%; among known primaries, multiple myeloma and breast carcinoma predominated. Extraspinal metastases were absent in 77%; MESCC occurred in 68%. Survival was < 60 days in 18%, 60 days–12 months in 29%, and ≥ 12 months in 54%. Solitary and oligometastatic spinal involvement showed numerically better one-year survival compared to multiple lesions, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Motor function improved in 16%; 14% underwent reoperation. Survival correlated with primary tumor (p = 0.004), extraspinal metastases (p = 0.001), and MESCC (p = 0.003), but not with demographics or surgical variables. In exploratory subgroups, ≥ 80% with breast carcinoma or myeloma survived ≥ 1 year, versus none with gastric or lung carcinoma. Conclusions Postoperative survival chiefly reflected tumor biology and systemic disease extent; MESCC portended poorer prognosis. Our findings suggest that the extent of vertebral involvement may have prognostic implications. Surgery achieved neurological stabilization or improvement in selected patients. Findings may inform multidisciplinary decision-making but need validation in larger cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44411-025-00379-z
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One-Year Survival Following Surgical Management of Spinal Metastases

Peter Tisovský, Boris Šteňo, Andrey Švec, Martin Bibza et al.
Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

One-Year Survival Following Surgical Management of Spinal Metastases

Peter Tisovský, Boris Šteňo, Andrey Švec, Martin Bibza, Veronika Boleková
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Metastatic spinal disease is a common complication of advanced cancer that causes pain, neurological deficits, and mechanical instability. Objective To identify factors associated with survival and motor function after surgery for spinal metastases. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 91 patients treated at a tertiary center (2016–2018). Variables included demographics, primary tumor, extraspinal disease, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), pre/postoperative motor function, procedure, and reoperations. Survival groups were < 60 days, 60 days–12 months, and ≥ 12 months. Associations were tested with univariable statistics (α = 0.05). Results Of 91 patients (56% male; mean age 62.4 ± 10.8 years), 74% underwent decompression and 78% stabilization. The primary tumor was unknown in 18%; among known primaries, multiple myeloma and breast carcinoma predominated. Extraspinal metastases were absent in 77%; MESCC occurred in 68%. Survival was < 60 days in 18%, 60 days–12 months in 29%, and ≥ 12 months in 54%. Solitary and oligometastatic spinal involvement showed numerically better one-year survival compared to multiple lesions, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Motor function improved in 16%; 14% underwent reoperation. Survival correlated with primary tumor (p = 0.004), extraspinal metastases (p = 0.001), and MESCC (p = 0.003), but not with demographics or surgical variables. In exploratory subgroups, ≥ 80% with breast carcinoma or myeloma survived ≥ 1 year, versus none with gastric or lung carcinoma. Conclusions Postoperative survival chiefly reflected tumor biology and systemic disease extent; MESCC portended poorer prognosis. Our findings suggest that the extent of vertebral involvement may have prognostic implications. Surgery achieved neurological stabilization or improvement in selected patients. Findings may inform multidisciplinary decision-making but need validation in larger cohorts.

Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journalVol. 126(12)
University Hospital Bratislava (SK), Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.