Research on performance evaluation of J enterprise under ESG concept

This study examines Company J through the lens of sustainability theory, stakeholder theory, and triple bottom line theory, analyzing its current development status while evaluating the necessity and feasibility of implementing an ESG performance assessment framework. The ESG evaluation system is constructed across four dimensions: financial, environmental, social, and governance (ESG), with 18 criterion layers derived into 50 representative third-level indicators. The research employs Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for indicator weighting and topsis method to calculate Company J's comprehensive ESG performance scores from 2020 to 2022. Through systematic evaluation, key factors influencing ESG performance scores and existing challenges are identified. Finally, targeted policy recommendations are proposed based on these findings to help companies improve ESG performance and drive sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/srhj1535
Primary Topic
Business and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on performance evaluation of J enterprise under ESG concept

Yuxin Miao
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Business and Economic Development
article

Research on performance evaluation of J enterprise under ESG concept

Yuxin Miao
article en

Abstract

This study examines Company J through the lens of sustainability theory, stakeholder theory, and triple bottom line theory, analyzing its current development status while evaluating the necessity and feasibility of implementing an ESG performance assessment framework. The ESG evaluation system is constructed across four dimensions: financial, environmental, social, and governance (ESG), with 18 criterion layers derived into 50 representative third-level indicators. The research employs Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for indicator weighting and topsis method to calculate Company J's comprehensive ESG performance scores from 2020 to 2022. Through systematic evaluation, key factors influencing ESG performance scores and existing challenges are identified. Finally, targeted policy recommendations are proposed based on these findings to help companies improve ESG performance and drive sustainable development.

Highlights in Business Economics and ManagementVol. 63
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Business and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on performance evaluation of J enterprise under ESG concept — Yuxin Miao · Highlights in Business Economics and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS