Stronger phylogenetic effects on birds than on plants, and on seed dispersal than on pollination mutualistic networks, in a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest

Uncovering the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the structure of ecological networks is crucial and presents a significant challenge. It has been reported that phylogenetically related species tend to have similar characteristics within ecological networks, with the strength of the phylogenetic signal varying among interacting groups. However, the patterns of phylogenetic signal in different interacting groups (e.g. plants and birds) across various network types (e.g. seed dispersal and pollination) has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, the question of whether phylogenetic specialists also exhibit high degree of interaction specialization in partner selection remains unresolved. We investigated the phylogenetic effect on the structure of annual and monthly plant-bird seed dispersal and pollination networks within a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest in Ailao Mountains, southwest China. Our study focused on examining phylogenetic signals in species degree, as well as in taxonomic and phylogenetic composition of interacting partners for both birds and plants of these two types of mutualistic networks. Additionally, we explored the relationship between phylogenetic specialization and interaction specialization of each plant/bird species within networks. We found weak phylogenetic signal in species degree for both plants and birds in any of the networks. However, we found variations in the strength of phylogenetic signals that are associated with taxonomic and phylogenetic composition among different interacting groups. Closely related bird species exhibited a tendency to interact with partners that had similar taxonomic and phylogenetic composition, particularly for frugivorous birds. This pattern was not observed in either fruiting or flowering plants. In addition, phylogenetically specialized frugivorous bird species tend to also be interaction specialists. However, no such association was observed among birds within pollination networks or among plants in either type of networks. The phylogenetic effects of birds are stronger than those of plants in plant-bird mutualistic networks. This trend is particularly pronounced in the context of seed dispersal networks, as compared to those involving pollination. Our findings highlight the evolutionary fingerprint on the structure of plant-bird mutualistic networks, revealing varying phylogenetic effects across different interaction groups and network types within a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Ecology
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70150
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stronger phylogenetic effects on birds than on plants, and on seed dispersal than on pollination mutualistic networks, in a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest

Ahimsa Campos‐Arceiz, Xuelian He, Luxiang Lin
1 citations
Journal of Animal Ecology
Plant and animal studies
3.03
article

Stronger phylogenetic effects on birds than on plants, and on seed dispersal than on pollination mutualistic networks, in a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest

Ahimsa Campos‐Arceiz, Xuelian He, Luxiang Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Uncovering the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the structure of ecological networks is crucial and presents a significant challenge. It has been reported that phylogenetically related species tend to have similar characteristics within ecological networks, with the strength of the phylogenetic signal varying among interacting groups. However, the patterns of phylogenetic signal in different interacting groups (e.g. plants and birds) across various network types (e.g. seed dispersal and pollination) has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, the question of whether phylogenetic specialists also exhibit high degree of interaction specialization in partner selection remains unresolved. We investigated the phylogenetic effect on the structure of annual and monthly plant-bird seed dispersal and pollination networks within a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest in Ailao Mountains, southwest China. Our study focused on examining phylogenetic signals in species degree, as well as in taxonomic and phylogenetic composition of interacting partners for both birds and plants of these two types of mutualistic networks. Additionally, we explored the relationship between phylogenetic specialization and interaction specialization of each plant/bird species within networks. We found weak phylogenetic signal in species degree for both plants and birds in any of the networks. However, we found variations in the strength of phylogenetic signals that are associated with taxonomic and phylogenetic composition among different interacting groups. Closely related bird species exhibited a tendency to interact with partners that had similar taxonomic and phylogenetic composition, particularly for frugivorous birds. This pattern was not observed in either fruiting or flowering plants. In addition, phylogenetically specialized frugivorous bird species tend to also be interaction specialists. However, no such association was observed among birds within pollination networks or among plants in either type of networks. The phylogenetic effects of birds are stronger than those of plants in plant-bird mutualistic networks. This trend is particularly pronounced in the context of seed dispersal networks, as compared to those involving pollination. Our findings highlight the evolutionary fingerprint on the structure of plant-bird mutualistic networks, revealing varying phylogenetic effects across different interaction groups and network types within a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest.

Journal of Animal EcologyVol. 94(12)
Bat Conservation International (US), Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant and animal studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.