Multimodal 3D-printed passive samplers to monitor, model and prioritise <i>in situ</i> pharmaceutical and pesticide pollution risks to an aquatic freshwater invertebrate, <i>Gammarus pulex</i>

Calibrated 3D-printed multi-modal passive sampler devices (3D-PSDs) were used herein both to monitor contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in freshwater and to estimate <i>in situ</i> chemical toxic and effect units for the aquatic invertebrate, <i>Gammarus pulex</i>, to support prioritisation strategies. A six-month study of water, biota, and 3D-PSDs in a heavily wastewater-impacted urban river catchment in London revealed 112 CECs detected, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs and transformation products (water = 50; 3D-PSDs = 99; and <i>G. pulex</i> = 58 CECs). In <i>G. pulex</i>, the top three most concentrated CECs were citalopram (an antidepressant, at 101 ± 11 ng g<sup>-1</sup>), imidacloprid and clothianidin (both neonicotinoid pesticides, at 63 ± 12 and 52 ± 39 ng g<sup>-1</sup>, respectively). Principal component analysis revealed that passive sampler data represented chemical occurrence in the <i>G. pulex</i> better than using water data. Strong correlations existed between the passive sampler and biomonitoring data (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > 0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.05) indicating a possibility to infer risk from the device directly and without using calibrated PSD uptake rates (<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>). This new approach showed promise as a potentially cost-effective way to rapidly prioritise sites and CECs for large-scale risk assessment campaigns for these species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science Processes & Impacts
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5em00452g
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal 3D-printed passive samplers to monitor, model and prioritise in situ pharmaceutical and pesticide pollution risks to an aquatic freshwater invertebrate, Gammarus pulex

Leon Barron, David J. Neep, Stephen R. Stürzenbaum
Environmental Science Processes & Impacts
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

Multimodal 3D-printed passive samplers to monitor, model and prioritise in situ pharmaceutical and pesticide pollution risks to an aquatic freshwater invertebrate, Gammarus pulex

Leon Barron, David J. Neep, Stephen R. Stürzenbaum
article en

Abstract

Calibrated 3D-printed multi-modal passive sampler devices (3D-PSDs) were used herein both to monitor contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in freshwater and to estimate <i>in situ</i> chemical toxic and effect units for the aquatic invertebrate, <i>Gammarus pulex</i>, to support prioritisation strategies. A six-month study of water, biota, and 3D-PSDs in a heavily wastewater-impacted urban river catchment in London revealed 112 CECs detected, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs and transformation products (water = 50; 3D-PSDs = 99; and <i>G. pulex</i> = 58 CECs). In <i>G. pulex</i>, the top three most concentrated CECs were citalopram (an antidepressant, at 101 ± 11 ng g<sup>-1</sup>), imidacloprid and clothianidin (both neonicotinoid pesticides, at 63 ± 12 and 52 ± 39 ng g<sup>-1</sup>, respectively). Principal component analysis revealed that passive sampler data represented chemical occurrence in the <i>G. pulex</i> better than using water data. Strong correlations existed between the passive sampler and biomonitoring data (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > 0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.05) indicating a possibility to infer risk from the device directly and without using calibrated PSD uptake rates (<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>). This new approach showed promise as a potentially cost-effective way to rapidly prioritise sites and CECs for large-scale risk assessment campaigns for these species.

Environmental Science Processes & ImpactsVol. 28(1)
King's College London (GB), Agilent Technologies (United Kingdom) (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.