Bayesian Inference on Stress–Strength Reliability with Geometric Distributions

This paper investigates the estimation of the stress–strength reliability parameter ρ=P(X≤Y), where stress (X) and strength (Y) are independently modeled by geometric distributions. Objective Bayesian approaches are employed by developing Jeffreys, reference, and probability-matching priors for ρ, and their effects on the resulting Bayes estimates are examined. Posterior inference is carried out using the random-walk Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. The performance of the proposed Bayesian estimators is assessed through extensive Monte Carlo simulations based on average estimates, root mean squared errors, and frequentist coverage probabilities of the highest posterior density credible intervals. Furthermore, the applicability of the methodology is demonstrated using two real data sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17101723
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Inference on Stress–Strength Reliability with Geometric Distributions

Mohammed Shakhatreh
Symmetry
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Bayesian Inference on Stress–Strength Reliability with Geometric Distributions

Mohammed Shakhatreh
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the estimation of the stress–strength reliability parameter ρ=P(X≤Y), where stress (X) and strength (Y) are independently modeled by geometric distributions. Objective Bayesian approaches are employed by developing Jeffreys, reference, and probability-matching priors for ρ, and their effects on the resulting Bayes estimates are examined. Posterior inference is carried out using the random-walk Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. The performance of the proposed Bayesian estimators is assessed through extensive Monte Carlo simulations based on average estimates, root mean squared errors, and frequentist coverage probabilities of the highest posterior density credible intervals. Furthermore, the applicability of the methodology is demonstrated using two real data sets.

SymmetryVol. 17(10)
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.