Uneven Grounds: Class, Gender, and the Social Distribution of Work Flexibility

This article analyzes the unequal distribution of perceived work flexibility in Chile, drawing on data from the 2023 National Time Use Survey (ENUT). Using multilevel multinomial logistic regression models, this study explores how individual and contextual variables shape the likelihood of perceiving jobs as fully flexible, partially flexible, or non-flexible. The findings reveal that flexibility is a stratified experience: women are more likely to access partial—but not full—flexibility; workers with higher educational attainment report lower perceptions of flexibility, and longer working hours are associated with diminished flexibility. Among the contextual factors, occupation stands out as the strongest predictor, explaining a substantial share of variance across the models. Employers are more likely to report full flexibility, while dependent workers tend to experience only limited forms of autonomy. These results challenge the notion of flexibility as a universally empowering feature of modern labor markets, underscoring the need for policies and organizational practices that address the structural inequalities embedded in flexible work arrangements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Societies
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15100286
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uneven Grounds: Class, Gender, and the Social Distribution of Work Flexibility

Hanns de la Fuente‐Mella, Nelson David Lay Raby, Gonzalo Ríos-Vásquez, Juan Felipe Espinosa‐Cristia
1 citations
Societies
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.82
article

Uneven Grounds: Class, Gender, and the Social Distribution of Work Flexibility

Hanns de la Fuente‐Mella, Nelson David Lay Raby, Gonzalo Ríos-Vásquez, Juan Felipe Espinosa‐Cristia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article analyzes the unequal distribution of perceived work flexibility in Chile, drawing on data from the 2023 National Time Use Survey (ENUT). Using multilevel multinomial logistic regression models, this study explores how individual and contextual variables shape the likelihood of perceiving jobs as fully flexible, partially flexible, or non-flexible. The findings reveal that flexibility is a stratified experience: women are more likely to access partial—but not full—flexibility; workers with higher educational attainment report lower perceptions of flexibility, and longer working hours are associated with diminished flexibility. Among the contextual factors, occupation stands out as the strongest predictor, explaining a substantial share of variance across the models. Employers are more likely to report full flexibility, while dependent workers tend to experience only limited forms of autonomy. These results challenge the notion of flexibility as a universally empowering feature of modern labor markets, underscoring the need for policies and organizational practices that address the structural inequalities embedded in flexible work arrangements.

SocietiesVol. 15(10)
Universidad Andrés Bello (CL), Pontificial Catholic University of Valparaiso (CL), Federico Santa María Technical University (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uneven Grounds: Class, Gender, and the Social Distribution of Work Flexibility — Hanns de la Fuente‐Mella, Nelson David Lay Raby, et al. · Societies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS