Workplace Violence, Self-Perceived Resilience and Associations with Turnover Intention Among Emergency Department Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Workplace violence remains an important vocational psycho-social risk for nurses employed in the emergency department (ED). We investigated the characteristics of workplace violence against ED nurses, and associations with self-assessed resilience, socio-demographic and vocational parameters, including turnover intention. <b>Methods</b>: ED nurses employed in all public hospitals in the Republic of Cyprus (RC) participated. After obtaining informed consent, data were collected using census sampling (January-June 2024) via the translated 2016 Italian National Survey on Violence towards Emergency Nurses Questionnaire (QuINVIP16) for investigating workplace violence characteristics, and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25) for assessing self-perceived resilience. <b>Results</b>: A total of 132 nurses (53.0% response rate) participated. Verbal violence was reported by 70.5% to 92.4% of participants. Long waiting times, overcrowded EDs, and perception of inadequate attention from healthcare professionals were reported as the primary triggers for violence towards participants by patients/visitors. One-third of participants reported that violence-reporting systems were unclear, while 1 out of 4 reported inadequate safety measures against violence. Participants with higher scores of self-perceived resilience were less likely to report turnover intention due to workplace violence (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while those with lower self-perceived resilience reported a significant decrease in work motivation (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Those who experienced decreased work motivation after exposure to a violent episode were more likely to consider a) leaving the profession [OR (95%CI): 79.1(17.7-353.2); <i>p</i> < 0.01], and b) moving to a different work setting [OR (95%CI): 17.0(3.8-76.2); <i>p</i> < 0.01], and actually applying to be transferred to a different work setting [OR (95%CI): 19.6(4.2-91.5); <i>p</i> < 0.01]. Moreover, those who had not attended communication skills training were 4 times more likely to consider leaving the profession following exposure to violence [OR (95%CI): 4.2(1.1-16.2); <i>p</i> = 0.04]. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study is among the few to link workplace violence with both resilience and actual turnover behaviors among emergency nurses, in general and particularly in the post-pandemic era. By showing how personal resilience in the face of violence is shaped by organizational support, such as reporting systems and training, the present findings move beyond individuals-level explanations, and highlight workplace violence as a systematic administrative challenge. This insight represents an important advance in current knowledge, and calls for multifaceted interventions that strengthen both personal and institutional capacity to address violence.