A Follow-Up on the Development of Problem-Solving Strategies in a Student with Autism

Students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often face difficulties in solving arithmetic word problems, particularly in transitioning from informal counting strategies to more efficient methods based on number facts and formal operations. This study examined the development of problem-solving strategies in a single student with ASD and intellectual disability across two sequential single-case experiments using multiple baseline designs. Study 1 (age 13 years 9 months; 17 sessions) employed Modified Schema-Based Instruction (MSBI) to teach addition and subtraction change problems, while Study 2 (age 14 years 10 months; 18 sessions) utilized the Conceptual Model-based Problem Solving (COMPS) approach for multiplication and division equal-group problems. Success was defined as both correctness of the response and correctly identifying the required operation. Results indicated that the student’s performance improved in all problem types in both studies, with maintenance observed 8 weeks after Study 1 and 5 weeks after Study 2. Instruction effects generalized to two-step addition and subtraction problems in Study 1, and to two-step addition and multiplication problems in Study 2. The findings indicate that both MSBI and COMPS facilitated the student’s shift from informal strategies to efficient operation-based problem solving. Implications for practice include the need for individualized reinforcements, careful adaptation of instruction, and providing teachers with a variety of problems and knowledge of these teaching methods to support students with ASD in developing advanced problem-solving skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101359
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Follow-Up on the Development of Problem-Solving Strategies in a Student with Autism

R. Fernández-Cobos, Irene Polo-Blanco, María José González López
Education Sciences
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

A Follow-Up on the Development of Problem-Solving Strategies in a Student with Autism

R. Fernández-Cobos, Irene Polo-Blanco, María José González López
article en

Abstract

Students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often face difficulties in solving arithmetic word problems, particularly in transitioning from informal counting strategies to more efficient methods based on number facts and formal operations. This study examined the development of problem-solving strategies in a single student with ASD and intellectual disability across two sequential single-case experiments using multiple baseline designs. Study 1 (age 13 years 9 months; 17 sessions) employed Modified Schema-Based Instruction (MSBI) to teach addition and subtraction change problems, while Study 2 (age 14 years 10 months; 18 sessions) utilized the Conceptual Model-based Problem Solving (COMPS) approach for multiplication and division equal-group problems. Success was defined as both correctness of the response and correctly identifying the required operation. Results indicated that the student’s performance improved in all problem types in both studies, with maintenance observed 8 weeks after Study 1 and 5 weeks after Study 2. Instruction effects generalized to two-step addition and subtraction problems in Study 1, and to two-step addition and multiplication problems in Study 2. The findings indicate that both MSBI and COMPS facilitated the student’s shift from informal strategies to efficient operation-based problem solving. Implications for practice include the need for individualized reinforcements, careful adaptation of instruction, and providing teachers with a variety of problems and knowledge of these teaching methods to support students with ASD in developing advanced problem-solving skills.

Education SciencesVol. 15(10)
Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.