Breaking barriers: understanding factors constraining women’s career choices and progression in the South African construction industry

Purpose This paper examines the barriers constraining women's career choices and progression within the South African construction industry. Design/methodology/approach The study employed a mixed-methods research approach, utilizing a questionnaire survey of construction industry workers listed in the Construction Professions Register, the Builders Collective and the Housing Assembly Organization. It also used interviews to validate the quantitative data. The data collected were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including factor analysis. Findings The study found that 39 of the 46 barriers identified have normalized values greater than 0.5 and, therefore, are classified as critical. From a ranking perspective, the top five barriers to the career choices and progression of women in the construction industry are male domination in the construction industry careers, gender bias, unfriendly workplace cultures, lack of strategies and policies for gender balance and educational expenses. Furthermore, the KMO score for this study is 0.778, which exceeds the standard threshold, meeting the required standards for principal component analysis. Research limitations/implications This study draws upon literature from other countries due to the limited literature available, specifically focusing on South Africa. However, such references may overlook the country's distinctive political history of racial segregation, which influences the research findings. Practical implications This study concludes that women will choose construction as a career and progress in the construction industry if targeted interventions and supportive environments promote gender inclusivity and encourage their professional growth. Originality/value This research helps shape initiatives to overcome barriers, such as underrepresentation, regarding women's professional aspirations and career progression within the construction sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-02-2025-0148
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking barriers: understanding factors constraining women’s career choices and progression in the South African construction industry

Abimbola Windapo, Muhammad Qasim Rana, Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin, João Alencastro et al.
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Breaking barriers: understanding factors constraining women’s career choices and progression in the South African construction industry

Abimbola Windapo, Muhammad Qasim Rana, Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin, João Alencastro, Amanda Filtane, Christiana Ekpo, Dineo Mbekwa
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines the barriers constraining women's career choices and progression within the South African construction industry. Design/methodology/approach The study employed a mixed-methods research approach, utilizing a questionnaire survey of construction industry workers listed in the Construction Professions Register, the Builders Collective and the Housing Assembly Organization. It also used interviews to validate the quantitative data. The data collected were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including factor analysis. Findings The study found that 39 of the 46 barriers identified have normalized values greater than 0.5 and, therefore, are classified as critical. From a ranking perspective, the top five barriers to the career choices and progression of women in the construction industry are male domination in the construction industry careers, gender bias, unfriendly workplace cultures, lack of strategies and policies for gender balance and educational expenses. Furthermore, the KMO score for this study is 0.778, which exceeds the standard threshold, meeting the required standards for principal component analysis. Research limitations/implications This study draws upon literature from other countries due to the limited literature available, specifically focusing on South Africa. However, such references may overlook the country's distinctive political history of racial segregation, which influences the research findings. Practical implications This study concludes that women will choose construction as a career and progress in the construction industry if targeted interventions and supportive environments promote gender inclusivity and encourage their professional growth. Originality/value This research helps shape initiatives to overcome barriers, such as underrepresentation, regarding women's professional aspirations and career progression within the construction sector.

Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International JournalVol. 44(9)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University College of Estate Management (GB), Faculty of Design (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.