An in vitro study on the antimicrobial efficacy of a calcium hydroxide versus a calcium silicate-based endodontic medicament

Intracanal medicaments are essential adjuncts to chemo-mechanical canal preparation when controlling endodontic infections; however, their antibacterial action may not be uniform due to the diversity of the involved species. This study aimed to compare the long-term antimicrobial efficacy, metabolic activity, and pH of two intracanal medicaments: calcium silicate-based BC Temp (BC) and DEHP calcium hydroxide (CH). The pH was examined over a 28-day period with and without freshly extracted tooth-root sections. Antimicrobial activity was assessed using a direct contact test (DCT) against Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mitis/oralis, Cutibacterium acnes, and Staphylococcus epidermidis, by quantifying colony-forming units (CFU). The metabolic activity and cell viability were measured using the colorimetric 2,3-Bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-Carboxanilide (XTT) assay. Statistical analysis was conducted using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc Tukey's and Šídák's tests. Both CH and BC demonstrated high alkalinity (pH 11–13), with CH maintaining higher pH for a longer period (14 days) compared to BC (7 days). No significant differences were observed when the pH of HBSS was measured with or without a sectioned tooth-root surface in contact with tested medicaments. Both medicaments exhibited effective antimicrobial activity against the tested planktonic bacteria. CH demonstrated rapid and superior antibacterial efficacy against E. faecalis and S.epidermidis at 48 h, while BC, which has a smaller particle size, sustained CFU reduction at later time points (21 and 28 days), particularly against S.mitis/oralis, S.epidermidis, and E.faecalis. Furthermore, the XTT assay indicated reduced cell viability following treatment with both CH and BC, with BC demonstrating a more stable effect over time and maintaining cell viability below 50% across all bacterial groups during 28-day period. While maintaining a pH similar to that of CH, which has a well-established antibacterial effect; the calcium silicate-based BC Temp exhibited enhanced antimicrobial activity against the tested bacteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06524-w
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An in vitro study on the antimicrobial efficacy of a calcium hydroxide versus a calcium silicate-based endodontic medicament

Sadia Niazi, Sherif Elsharkawy, Debarati Jana, Eda Dzinovic et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

An in vitro study on the antimicrobial efficacy of a calcium hydroxide versus a calcium silicate-based endodontic medicament

Sadia Niazi, Sherif Elsharkawy, Debarati Jana, Eda Dzinovic, A. Almaroof, Dev Mehta
article en

Abstract

Intracanal medicaments are essential adjuncts to chemo-mechanical canal preparation when controlling endodontic infections; however, their antibacterial action may not be uniform due to the diversity of the involved species. This study aimed to compare the long-term antimicrobial efficacy, metabolic activity, and pH of two intracanal medicaments: calcium silicate-based BC Temp (BC) and DEHP calcium hydroxide (CH). The pH was examined over a 28-day period with and without freshly extracted tooth-root sections. Antimicrobial activity was assessed using a direct contact test (DCT) against Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mitis/oralis, Cutibacterium acnes, and Staphylococcus epidermidis, by quantifying colony-forming units (CFU). The metabolic activity and cell viability were measured using the colorimetric 2,3-Bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-Carboxanilide (XTT) assay. Statistical analysis was conducted using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc Tukey's and Šídák's tests. Both CH and BC demonstrated high alkalinity (pH 11–13), with CH maintaining higher pH for a longer period (14 days) compared to BC (7 days). No significant differences were observed when the pH of HBSS was measured with or without a sectioned tooth-root surface in contact with tested medicaments. Both medicaments exhibited effective antimicrobial activity against the tested planktonic bacteria. CH demonstrated rapid and superior antibacterial efficacy against E. faecalis and S.epidermidis at 48 h, while BC, which has a smaller particle size, sustained CFU reduction at later time points (21 and 28 days), particularly against S.mitis/oralis, S.epidermidis, and E.faecalis. Furthermore, the XTT assay indicated reduced cell viability following treatment with both CH and BC, with BC demonstrating a more stable effect over time and maintaining cell viability below 50% across all bacterial groups during 28-day period. While maintaining a pH similar to that of CH, which has a well-established antibacterial effect; the calcium silicate-based BC Temp exhibited enhanced antimicrobial activity against the tested bacteria.

Clinical Oral InvestigationsVol. 29(11)
University of Baghdad (IQ), King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.