ISTINBATH HUKUM PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA MENURUT RASYID RIDHA DAN YUSUF AL-QARDHAWI

This study aims to: 1) Investigate the methods of Islamic legal reasoning employed by Muhammad Rashid Rida and Yusuf Al-Qardhawi in the context of interfaith marriage, and 2) Assess the relevance and applicability of the legal reasoning approaches of these two scholars in addressing contemporary legal issues. This study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method, where the researcher analyzes the writings and fatwas of both scholars as well as relevant secondary sources. The data analysis technique used is content analysis, focusing on methods of Islamic legal reasoning such as ta'lil, qiyas, istishab, and istihsan. The research findings indicate that: 1) Muhammad Rashid Rida tends to use the methods of qiyas and istihsan, considering broader benefits and maslahah, while Yusuf Al-Qardhawi relies more on ta'lil and istishab, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the integrity and order of existing Islamic law. 2) The different approaches to legal reasoning between the two scholars reflect their views on social dynamics and the needs of the community, demonstrating their relevance and applicability in responding to contemporary issues and the importance of constructive dialogue among various Islamic perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Usroh
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24260/al-usroh.v4i2.2962
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marriage and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ISTINBATH HUKUM PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA MENURUT RASYID RIDHA DAN YUSUF AL-QARDHAWI

Imron Mustofa, Agus Solikin, Abal Qosim Al Banan
1 citations
Al-Usroh
Marriage and Family Dynamics
1.13
article

ISTINBATH HUKUM PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA MENURUT RASYID RIDHA DAN YUSUF AL-QARDHAWI

Imron Mustofa, Agus Solikin, Abal Qosim Al Banan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to: 1) Investigate the methods of Islamic legal reasoning employed by Muhammad Rashid Rida and Yusuf Al-Qardhawi in the context of interfaith marriage, and 2) Assess the relevance and applicability of the legal reasoning approaches of these two scholars in addressing contemporary legal issues. This study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method, where the researcher analyzes the writings and fatwas of both scholars as well as relevant secondary sources. The data analysis technique used is content analysis, focusing on methods of Islamic legal reasoning such as ta'lil, qiyas, istishab, and istihsan. The research findings indicate that: 1) Muhammad Rashid Rida tends to use the methods of qiyas and istihsan, considering broader benefits and maslahah, while Yusuf Al-Qardhawi relies more on ta'lil and istishab, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the integrity and order of existing Islamic law. 2) The different approaches to legal reasoning between the two scholars reflect their views on social dynamics and the needs of the community, demonstrating their relevance and applicability in responding to contemporary issues and the importance of constructive dialogue among various Islamic perspectives.

Al-UsrohVol. 4(2)
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Marriage and Family Dynamics
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.