Normalization of deviance in neuromodulation for epilepsy

The rapid expansion of neuromodulation therapies for drug resistant epilepsy has introduced a growing risk of normalization of deviance (NoD). This occurs when incremental deviations from established procedures are iteratively reinterpreted as the care standard in the absence of immediate adverse outcomes. While motivated by an urgent need to develop novel therapies to improve the quality-of-life of persons with epilepsy, NoD risks harm to the very individuals these neurotechnologies are designed to help. In this commentary, we borrow from organizational safety research to highlight systemic, institutional, and cultural factors that enable NoD in the pursuit of neuromodulation for epilepsy. We highlight the dual imperative of driving forward innovations in neurotechnologies while prioritizing patient safety. Finally, we propose safeguards against NoD including institutional review, centralized data collection, and cultural shifts that prioritize safety and mitigate risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epilepsia
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18679
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normalization of deviance in neuromodulation for epilepsy

Karim Mithani, George M. Ibrahim
Epilepsia
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Normalization of deviance in neuromodulation for epilepsy

Karim Mithani, George M. Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

The rapid expansion of neuromodulation therapies for drug resistant epilepsy has introduced a growing risk of normalization of deviance (NoD). This occurs when incremental deviations from established procedures are iteratively reinterpreted as the care standard in the absence of immediate adverse outcomes. While motivated by an urgent need to develop novel therapies to improve the quality-of-life of persons with epilepsy, NoD risks harm to the very individuals these neurotechnologies are designed to help. In this commentary, we borrow from organizational safety research to highlight systemic, institutional, and cultural factors that enable NoD in the pursuit of neuromodulation for epilepsy. We highlight the dual imperative of driving forward innovations in neurotechnologies while prioritizing patient safety. Finally, we propose safeguards against NoD including institutional review, centralized data collection, and cultural shifts that prioritize safety and mitigate risk.

EpilepsiaVol. 67(2)
University of Toronto (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Normalization of deviance in neuromodulation for epilepsy — Karim Mithani, George M. Ibrahim · Epilepsia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS