High school students’ expectancy-value-cost profile in mathematics: Differences in academic behaviors and achievement

This study conducted latent profile analysis based on expectancy-value theory to identify motivation profiles of high school students in mathematics, using expectancy, task values (intrinsic, attainment, utility), and perceived costs (effort, oppor tunity, emotional) as indicators. Five distinct profiles emerged: (1) adaptive (high expectancy/value, low cost), (2) high-motiva tion-high-burden, (3) moderate motivation, (4) low-motivation-high-burden, and (5) maladaptive (low expectancy/value, high cost). These profiles showed significant differences in academic behaviors (class participation, study time, delay, and career in tention) and achievement. Notably, the high-motivation-high-burden group demonstrated similar study time to the adaptive group despite high costs, suggesting that cost perceptions do not uniformly undermine achievement. Findings highlight the need for differentiated motivational support in mathematics education.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2025.28.3.004
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Programs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High school students’ expectancy-value-cost profile in mathematics: Differences in academic behaviors and achievement

Yeon-kyoung Woo, Young In Choi, Kim Seong-kyeong, Song Jung
Mathematics Education and Programs
article

High school students’ expectancy-value-cost profile in mathematics: Differences in academic behaviors and achievement

Yeon-kyoung Woo, Young In Choi, Kim Seong-kyeong, Song Jung
article en

Abstract

This study conducted latent profile analysis based on expectancy-value theory to identify motivation profiles of high school students in mathematics, using expectancy, task values (intrinsic, attainment, utility), and perceived costs (effort, oppor tunity, emotional) as indicators. Five distinct profiles emerged: (1) adaptive (high expectancy/value, low cost), (2) high-motiva tion-high-burden, (3) moderate motivation, (4) low-motivation-high-burden, and (5) maladaptive (low expectancy/value, high cost). These profiles showed significant differences in academic behaviors (class participation, study time, delay, and career in tention) and achievement. Notably, the high-motivation-high-burden group demonstrated similar study time to the adaptive group despite high costs, suggesting that cost perceptions do not uniformly undermine achievement. Findings highlight the need for differentiated motivational support in mathematics education.

Vol. 28(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Mathematics Education and Programs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.