Refining the teacher design capacity framework based on pre-service teachers’ ‘design-implementation-redesign’ cycle

This study explores the development of pre-service teachers’ design capacity within digital technology environments through a ‘design-implementation-redesign’ cycle. Employing a qualitative case study, we analyzed how elementary pre-serv ice teachers designed, micro-taught, and subsequently redesigned lessons using dynamic geometry software, addressing the limitations of existing frameworks in explaining the dynamic interplay between implementation and redesign. The findings spec ify ‘design-in-use’ capacity into ‘providing immediate scaffolding for unexpected difficulties’ and ‘pedagogical transformation.’ ‘Redesign’ capacity was systematized into ‘reflection and analysis’ and ‘revision and proposal.’ This research is significant for elucidating teacher design capacity as a dynamic process evolving through practical implementation and reflection, and for em phasizing the importance of cyclical learning experiences in pre-service teacher education.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2025.28.3.006
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining the teacher design capacity framework based on pre-service teachers’ ‘design-implementation-redesign’ cycle

Nayoung Ku
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Refining the teacher design capacity framework based on pre-service teachers’ ‘design-implementation-redesign’ cycle

Nayoung Ku
article en

Abstract

This study explores the development of pre-service teachers’ design capacity within digital technology environments through a ‘design-implementation-redesign’ cycle. Employing a qualitative case study, we analyzed how elementary pre-serv ice teachers designed, micro-taught, and subsequently redesigned lessons using dynamic geometry software, addressing the limitations of existing frameworks in explaining the dynamic interplay between implementation and redesign. The findings spec ify ‘design-in-use’ capacity into ‘providing immediate scaffolding for unexpected difficulties’ and ‘pedagogical transformation.’ ‘Redesign’ capacity was systematized into ‘reflection and analysis’ and ‘revision and proposal.’ This research is significant for elucidating teacher design capacity as a dynamic process evolving through practical implementation and reflection, and for em phasizing the importance of cyclical learning experiences in pre-service teacher education.

Vol. 28(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Refining the teacher design capacity framework based on pre-service teachers’ ‘design-implementation-redesign’ cycle — Nayoung Ku · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS