Applying the Cultural Values Model to assess biocultural change in Eastern European wood‐pastures

Abstract Traditional wood‐pastures are emblematic of multifunctional farming systems. Despite their exceptional ecological and cultural value, these systems are undergoing rapid transformation under the combined pressures of modernization, land‐use intensification and shifting societal values. We apply the Stephenson's Cultural Values Model to assess the biocultural complexity of 110 ancient wood‐pastures across Transylvania, Romania, a unique region of Eastern Europe, where traditional land‐use systems persist amidst accelerating institutional and economic change. The three dimensions of the Cultural Values Model—‘Forms’ (material structures), ‘Practices’ (land‐use activities) and ‘Relationships’ (cultural meanings and memories)—were quantified through field surveys and 32 semi‐structured interviews with local stakeholders. Our results reveal diverse biocultural profiles, with traditional and modern elements (i.e. ‘Forms’ and ‘Practices’) frequently co‐occurring. While many sites retain legacy features such as scattered veteran trees and extensive grazing, signs of social‐ecological reconfiguration are evident, including electric fencing, mechanized infrastructure, and declining communal governance. Landscape‐level analyses show that traditional features (‘Forms’, ‘Practices’ in the Cultural Values Model framework) persist more often in rugged terrains, whereas modernization predominates in flatter, more accessible areas. Interview data show an erosion of cultural engagement, stewardship norms and local agency. Our findings suggest that the transformation of ancient wood‐pastures can be effectively traced through the three pillars of the Cultural Values Model: ‘Forms’, ‘Practices’ and ‘Relationships’. The framework proved especially valuable in disentangling how material, functional and symbolic dimensions of these landscapes evolve in response to socio‐economic and institutional pressures. We also showed that the Cultural Values Model can be a practical tool for assessing biocultural complexity and identifying early signs of system reconfiguration of traditional farming systems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70169
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Culinary Culture and Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying the Cultural Values Model to assess biocultural change in Eastern European wood‐pastures

László Rákosy, Viorel Arghiuș, Mihai Alin Pop, Ruxandra Malina Petrescu‐Mag et al.
3 citations
People and Nature
Culinary Culture and Tourism
3.49
article

Applying the Cultural Values Model to assess biocultural change in Eastern European wood‐pastures

László Rákosy, Viorel Arghiuș, Mihai Alin Pop, Ruxandra Malina Petrescu‐Mag, Noémi Antal, Tibor Hartel, Alexandru Sabin Bădărău, Kinga‐Olga Réti, Imola Püsök, Cristian Maloș, Thorsten Wagener, Dacinia Crina Petrescu, Laura Bouriaud, Frank Wagener, László Csákány, Mihaela Spac
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Traditional wood‐pastures are emblematic of multifunctional farming systems. Despite their exceptional ecological and cultural value, these systems are undergoing rapid transformation under the combined pressures of modernization, land‐use intensification and shifting societal values. We apply the Stephenson's Cultural Values Model to assess the biocultural complexity of 110 ancient wood‐pastures across Transylvania, Romania, a unique region of Eastern Europe, where traditional land‐use systems persist amidst accelerating institutional and economic change. The three dimensions of the Cultural Values Model—‘Forms’ (material structures), ‘Practices’ (land‐use activities) and ‘Relationships’ (cultural meanings and memories)—were quantified through field surveys and 32 semi‐structured interviews with local stakeholders. Our results reveal diverse biocultural profiles, with traditional and modern elements (i.e. ‘Forms’ and ‘Practices’) frequently co‐occurring. While many sites retain legacy features such as scattered veteran trees and extensive grazing, signs of social‐ecological reconfiguration are evident, including electric fencing, mechanized infrastructure, and declining communal governance. Landscape‐level analyses show that traditional features (‘Forms’, ‘Practices’ in the Cultural Values Model framework) persist more often in rugged terrains, whereas modernization predominates in flatter, more accessible areas. Interview data show an erosion of cultural engagement, stewardship norms and local agency. Our findings suggest that the transformation of ancient wood‐pastures can be effectively traced through the three pillars of the Cultural Values Model: ‘Forms’, ‘Practices’ and ‘Relationships’. The framework proved especially valuable in disentangling how material, functional and symbolic dimensions of these landscapes evolve in response to socio‐economic and institutional pressures. We also showed that the Cultural Values Model can be a practical tool for assessing biocultural complexity and identifying early signs of system reconfiguration of traditional farming systems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 7(11)
Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava (RO), Trier University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Bucharest (RO), University of Donja Gorica (ME), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Culinary Culture and Tourism
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.