Bugbears in the Waiting Room: Revisiting Arber and Sawyer's Classic Study of GP Reception Work Using Ethnography in Eight English General Practices

In 1985, Arber and Sawyer described the discretionary rationing power of general practice receptionists. Our paper revisits this territory. Much has changed in the intervening decades. Digitalisation has altered reception work. Increasing multimorbidity and rising chronic illness, combined with a dwindling workforce, restricted funding and systemic pressures on public services, have fuelled the 'crisis' in general practice. 'Unacceptable' delays in getting a general practitioner (GP) appointment are seen as evidence of this. Our focused ethnography in eight English NHS general practices highlights important shifts in receptionists' management of GP access. We observed waiting and reception areas, interviewed 70 staff and 74 patients and examined practice documents. Arber and Sawyer's dragon metaphor remains salient, but receptionists have new strategies of bureaucratic distancing and redirection to manage appointment requests. They are gatekeepers still and remain a target for hostility but mitigate this by using these strategies. Patients on a quest to obtain an appointment with a GP may still be thwarted and sometimes meet dragons at the desk, but they may more often find themselves allied with the receptionist. The barrier to getting a GP appointment has become the access system and its discorporate digital forms, rather than the receptionist or the GPs she protects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Health & Illness
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70104
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bugbears in the Waiting Room: Revisiting Arber and Sawyer's Classic Study of GP Reception Work Using Ethnography in Eight English General Practices

Jennifer Heath, Catherine J. Pope, Toto Gronlund, Helen Atherton et al.
Sociology of Health & Illness
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Bugbears in the Waiting Room: Revisiting Arber and Sawyer's Classic Study of GP Reception Work Using Ethnography in Eight English General Practices

Jennifer Heath, Catherine J. Pope, Toto Gronlund, Helen Atherton, Abi Eccles, Carol Bryce, C. S. G. Phillips, Annelieke Driessen, Bella Wheeler
article en

Abstract

In 1985, Arber and Sawyer described the discretionary rationing power of general practice receptionists. Our paper revisits this territory. Much has changed in the intervening decades. Digitalisation has altered reception work. Increasing multimorbidity and rising chronic illness, combined with a dwindling workforce, restricted funding and systemic pressures on public services, have fuelled the 'crisis' in general practice. 'Unacceptable' delays in getting a general practitioner (GP) appointment are seen as evidence of this. Our focused ethnography in eight English NHS general practices highlights important shifts in receptionists' management of GP access. We observed waiting and reception areas, interviewed 70 staff and 74 patients and examined practice documents. Arber and Sawyer's dragon metaphor remains salient, but receptionists have new strategies of bureaucratic distancing and redirection to manage appointment requests. They are gatekeepers still and remain a target for hostility but mitigate this by using these strategies. Patients on a quest to obtain an appointment with a GP may still be thwarted and sometimes meet dragons at the desk, but they may more often find themselves allied with the receptionist. The barrier to getting a GP appointment has become the access system and its discorporate digital forms, rather than the receptionist or the GPs she protects.

Sociology of Health & IllnessVol. 47(8)
University of Warwick (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Delivery Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.