Recent developments in ITER magnetic control algorithms

Axi-symmetric magnetic control functions are an important part of the ITER Plasma Control System (PCS) which is now at an advanced design stage. They are aimed at plasma current control, plasma shape control, and vertical stabilization. In principle, these control actions could be decoupled using different sets of active CS/PF coils as in many existing tokamaks. However, in large tokamaks with superconducting coils the controller design becomes more challenging given the high level of coupling among control circuits, the long control fields penetration time, and the use of the same actuators for different control purposes (the so-called actuator sharing ). The objective of this paper is to make evidence of ITER PCS flexibility with an illustration of the architecture of the axi-symmetric magnetic control. Important features are (i) the capability to implement both a current-driven and a voltage-driven control scheme, (ii) the capability of controlling the plasma current either at the shape control level or at the circuit current control level, (iii) the concurrent use of both in-vessel and ex-vessel coils to tackle the vertical stabilization problem, (iv) and the capability to manage coil current limits and other exceptions in real-time. To guarantee satisfactory performance over all the operating envelope, a scheduling of the controller parameters is implemented at the control functions level, whereas a magnetic control local supervisor is in charge of the interface with the higher level supervisor, as well as of control algorithms selection. The design is carried out according to the general philosophy of the PCS design including also test assessments on the PCSSP platform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fusion Engineering and Design
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.115492
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recent developments in ITER magnetic control algorithms

G. De Tommasi, Luigi Pangione, M. Mattei, M. Ariola et al.
2 citations
Fusion Engineering and Design
Magnetic confinement fusion research
3.74
article

Recent developments in ITER magnetic control algorithms

G. De Tommasi, Luigi Pangione, M. Mattei, M. Ariola, Luigi Emanuel di Grazia, R. Ambrosino, Y. Gribov, A. Pironti, Luca Zabeo, Peter de Vries
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Axi-symmetric magnetic control functions are an important part of the ITER Plasma Control System (PCS) which is now at an advanced design stage. They are aimed at plasma current control, plasma shape control, and vertical stabilization. In principle, these control actions could be decoupled using different sets of active CS/PF coils as in many existing tokamaks. However, in large tokamaks with superconducting coils the controller design becomes more challenging given the high level of coupling among control circuits, the long control fields penetration time, and the use of the same actuators for different control purposes (the so-called actuator sharing ). The objective of this paper is to make evidence of ITER PCS flexibility with an illustration of the architecture of the axi-symmetric magnetic control. Important features are (i) the capability to implement both a current-driven and a voltage-driven control scheme, (ii) the capability of controlling the plasma current either at the shape control level or at the circuit current control level, (iii) the concurrent use of both in-vessel and ex-vessel coils to tackle the vertical stabilization problem, (iv) and the capability to manage coil current limits and other exceptions in real-time. To guarantee satisfactory performance over all the operating envelope, a scheduling of the controller parameters is implemented at the control functions level, whereas a magnetic control local supervisor is in charge of the interface with the higher level supervisor, as well as of control algorithms selection. The design is carried out according to the general philosophy of the PCS design including also test assessments on the PCSSP platform.

Fusion Engineering and DesignVol. 222
ITER (FR), Parthenope University of Naples (IT), Consorzio CREO (Italy) (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.