Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning and Traditional Methods for High-Resolution Cropland Extraction with Different Training Data Characteristics

High-resolution remote sensing (HRRS) imagery enables the extraction of cropland information with high levels of detail, especially when combined with the impressive performance of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) in understanding these images. Comprehending the factors influencing DCNNs’ performance in HRRS cropland extraction is of considerable importance for practical agricultural monitoring applications. This study investigates the impact of classifier selection and different training data characteristics on the HRRS cropland classification outcomes. Specifically, Gaofen-1 composite images with 2 m spatial resolution are employed for HRRS cropland extraction, and two county-wide regions with distinct agricultural landscapes in Shandong Province, China, are selected as the study areas. The performance of two deep learning (DL) algorithms (UNet and DeepLabv3+) and a traditional classification algorithm, Object-Based Image Analysis with Random Forest (OBIA-RF), is compared. Additionally, the effects of different band combinations, crop growth stages, and class mislabeling on the classification accuracy are evaluated. The results demonstrated that the UNet and DeepLabv3+ models outperformed OBIA-RF in both simple and complex agricultural landscapes, and were insensitive to the changes in band combinations, indicating their ability to learn abstract features and contextual semantic information for HRRS cropland extraction. Moreover, compared with the DL models, OBIA-RF was more sensitive to changes in the temporal characteristics. The performance of all three models was unaffected when the mislabeling error ratio remained below 5%. Beyond this threshold, the performance of all models decreased, with UNet and DeepLabv3+ showing similar performance decline trends and OBIA-RF suffering a more drastic reduction. Furthermore, the DL models exhibited relatively low sensitivity to the patch size of sample blocks and data augmentation. These findings can facilitate the design of operational implementations for practical applications.