Multicenter evaluation of the QuickMIC® rapid AST system in clinical practice: impact on turnaround time compared to routine AST systems

Increased antibiotic resistance highlights the need for new, rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests to guide therapy, especially in critical disease such as bloodstream infections and sepsis. This study investigates a new ultra-rapid AST system in multiple clinical laboratories, with respect to accuracy, speed and turnaround time in comparison to commonly used AST systems. The QuickMIC system is compared to the commonly used automated AST systems BD Phoenix™ (BD, USA), MicroScan WalkAway plus (Beckman Coulter, USA) and VITEK<sup>®</sup> 2 (bioMérieux, France) by concurrent testing of incoming positive blood-cultures with Gram-negative bacteria in four clinical laboratories located in the EU and USA, on the basis of agreement of results, time-to-result (TTR, analysis time) and turnaround time (TAT, time from blood culture positivity or blood culture processing to actionable result). A total of 155 patient samples were included, totaling 10 species of Gram-negative bacteria. The overall EA and CA between QuickMIC<sup>®</sup> GN and each routine AST system was > 95%, while overall bias was within the acceptable range of ± 30%. QuickMIC time-to-result was on average 3 h and 4 min, compared to 9-19 h for the routine systems. The average QuickMIC system turnaround-time ranged from 10 to 11 h 30 min, compared to 22-45 h for the routine systems. The QuickMIC system represents a promising rapid AST technology with potential to reduce time-to-result and overall turnaround-time of clinically actionable AST results compared with the most common routinely used automated AST methods, while maintaining good accuracy and quality of results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05298-z
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multicenter evaluation of the QuickMIC® rapid AST system in clinical practice: impact on turnaround time compared to routine AST systems

Logan Patterson, Matthew L. Faron, Celia García-Rivera, Jessica Hoff et al.
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Multicenter evaluation of the QuickMIC® rapid AST system in clinical practice: impact on turnaround time compared to routine AST systems

Logan Patterson, Matthew L. Faron, Celia García-Rivera, Jessica Hoff, Brian Mesich, Nikolaos Athanasiou, Marina Ivanova, Christer Malmberg, Kevin Alby, Cecilia Johansson, Nicole E. VanZeeland, Derek Gerstbrein, Amanda Åman, Juan Carlos Rodrı́guez, Anna Olsson, Andrea Ricart-Silvestre, Alexandra Rafeletou, Julia Vahturova
article en

Abstract

Increased antibiotic resistance highlights the need for new, rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests to guide therapy, especially in critical disease such as bloodstream infections and sepsis. This study investigates a new ultra-rapid AST system in multiple clinical laboratories, with respect to accuracy, speed and turnaround time in comparison to commonly used AST systems. The QuickMIC system is compared to the commonly used automated AST systems BD Phoenix™ (BD, USA), MicroScan WalkAway plus (Beckman Coulter, USA) and VITEK<sup>®</sup> 2 (bioMérieux, France) by concurrent testing of incoming positive blood-cultures with Gram-negative bacteria in four clinical laboratories located in the EU and USA, on the basis of agreement of results, time-to-result (TTR, analysis time) and turnaround time (TAT, time from blood culture positivity or blood culture processing to actionable result). A total of 155 patient samples were included, totaling 10 species of Gram-negative bacteria. The overall EA and CA between QuickMIC<sup>®</sup> GN and each routine AST system was > 95%, while overall bias was within the acceptable range of ± 30%. QuickMIC time-to-result was on average 3 h and 4 min, compared to 9-19 h for the routine systems. The average QuickMIC system turnaround-time ranged from 10 to 11 h 30 min, compared to 22-45 h for the routine systems. The QuickMIC system represents a promising rapid AST technology with potential to reduce time-to-result and overall turnaround-time of clinically actionable AST results compared with the most common routinely used automated AST methods, while maintaining good accuracy and quality of results.

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious DiseasesVol. 45(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Uppsala University (SE), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), East Tallinn Central Hospital (EE), Gradientech (Sweden) (SE), Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.