Estimating Policy Impact in a Difference-in-Differences Hazard Model: A Simulation Study

This article estimates the impact of a policy change on an event probability in a difference-in-differences hazard model using four estimators. We examine the error distributions of the estimators via a simulation experiment with twelve different scenarios. In four simulation scenarios when all relevant variables are known, three of the four methods yield accurate estimates of the policy impact. In eight simulation scenarios when an individual characteristic is unobservable to the researcher, only one method (nonparametric maximum likelihood) achieves accurate estimates of the policy change. The other three methods (standard Cox, three-step Cox, and linear probability) are severely biased.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risks
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13100200
Primary Topic
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Policy Impact in a Difference-in-Differences Hazard Model: A Simulation Study

David A. Hsieh
Risks
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
article

Estimating Policy Impact in a Difference-in-Differences Hazard Model: A Simulation Study

David A. Hsieh
article en

Abstract

This article estimates the impact of a policy change on an event probability in a difference-in-differences hazard model using four estimators. We examine the error distributions of the estimators via a simulation experiment with twelve different scenarios. In four simulation scenarios when all relevant variables are known, three of the four methods yield accurate estimates of the policy impact. In eight simulation scenarios when an individual characteristic is unobservable to the researcher, only one method (nonparametric maximum likelihood) achieves accurate estimates of the policy change. The other three methods (standard Cox, three-step Cox, and linear probability) are severely biased.

RisksVol. 13(10)
Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.