Implementation Feasibility and Efficiency of Automobile Energy Recovery Systems

This study will investigate five energy recovery systems. The feasibility of implementation and fuel efficiency are the standards for evaluating electric turbochargers (E-Turbos), mechanical flywheels, thermoelectric generators (TEGs), Rankine cycle generators and regenerative braking systems (RBSs). The feasibility of E-Turbos was evaluated under the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) and the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). RBSs showed high feasibility and recovered up to 50% of braking energy. TEGs generated an average of 5.8W of electrical energy. Flywheel energy storage systems (FESSs) can help buses increase efficiency by nearly 40%. An organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) generator can recover up to 34% of energy. RBSs were found to be the most effective and feasible solution among those evaluated. Future research should focus on optimizing the integration of regenerative braking system with hybrid or electric powertrains, and exploring the potential of combing multiple energy recovery methods and control strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Computational Engineering
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2026.ka27443
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Feasibility and Efficiency of Automobile Energy Recovery Systems

Kaishuai Yang, Zicheng Zhong, Zhixin Chen, Hui Pan et al.
Applied and Computational Engineering
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Implementation Feasibility and Efficiency of Automobile Energy Recovery Systems

Kaishuai Yang, Zicheng Zhong, Zhixin Chen, Hui Pan, Zhe Xu
article en

Abstract

This study will investigate five energy recovery systems. The feasibility of implementation and fuel efficiency are the standards for evaluating electric turbochargers (E-Turbos), mechanical flywheels, thermoelectric generators (TEGs), Rankine cycle generators and regenerative braking systems (RBSs). The feasibility of E-Turbos was evaluated under the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) and the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). RBSs showed high feasibility and recovered up to 50% of braking energy. TEGs generated an average of 5.8W of electrical energy. Flywheel energy storage systems (FESSs) can help buses increase efficiency by nearly 40%. An organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) generator can recover up to 34% of energy. RBSs were found to be the most effective and feasible solution among those evaluated. Future research should focus on optimizing the integration of regenerative braking system with hybrid or electric powertrains, and exploring the potential of combing multiple energy recovery methods and control strategies.

Applied and Computational EngineeringVol. 188(1)
Shanghai Business School (CN), Nanjing Foreign Language School (CN), University of Warwick (GB), International School of Management (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.