A Systems Thinking Framework for Assessing and Enhancing Jordan’s Progress Towards SDG 16.1

This study was initially designed to assess Jordan’s decade-long progress toward sustainable development goal (SDG) 16.1. However, that assessment revealed a puzzling ‘Jordanian paradox’, which necessitated the development of a systems-thinking framework to explain the data and pinpoint leverage points for accelerated violence reduction. Drawing on 11 years (2013–2023) of official police and socioeconomic data series, we combine descriptive statistics, trend lines, Pearson correlations (with a focus on |r| > 0.80) and high-fit (R2 > 0.75) regression models. The data show that while violent and property offenses fell significantly, drug-trafficking and cybercrime surged. Two feedback structures explain this paradox. A balancing loop shows that conventional policing suppresses traditional violence. A reinforcing loop links high unemployment and broader socioeconomic strain to modern, networked offenses that erode public trust, deter investment, and feed back into unemployment. A policy-ready causal loop diagram (CLD) visualizes these dynamics. Scenario modeling indicates that cutting unemployment by two percentage points could prevent approximately 1990 drug cases and 2200 cyber incidents annually, while producing only a modest uptick in crimes against persons. Sustaining SDG 16.1 gains, therefore, requires an integrated package that simultaneously weakens the reinforcing loop – through youth jobs, social protection and digital-literacy programs – and strengthens the balancing loop via targeted cyber- and border-security measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2568185
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systems Thinking Framework for Assessing and Enhancing Jordan’s Progress Towards SDG 16.1

Rasha Ahmed Al-Rkebat
Cogent Social Sciences
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

A Systems Thinking Framework for Assessing and Enhancing Jordan’s Progress Towards SDG 16.1

Rasha Ahmed Al-Rkebat
article en

Abstract

This study was initially designed to assess Jordan’s decade-long progress toward sustainable development goal (SDG) 16.1. However, that assessment revealed a puzzling ‘Jordanian paradox’, which necessitated the development of a systems-thinking framework to explain the data and pinpoint leverage points for accelerated violence reduction. Drawing on 11 years (2013–2023) of official police and socioeconomic data series, we combine descriptive statistics, trend lines, Pearson correlations (with a focus on |r| > 0.80) and high-fit (R2 > 0.75) regression models. The data show that while violent and property offenses fell significantly, drug-trafficking and cybercrime surged. Two feedback structures explain this paradox. A balancing loop shows that conventional policing suppresses traditional violence. A reinforcing loop links high unemployment and broader socioeconomic strain to modern, networked offenses that erode public trust, deter investment, and feed back into unemployment. A policy-ready causal loop diagram (CLD) visualizes these dynamics. Scenario modeling indicates that cutting unemployment by two percentage points could prevent approximately 1990 drug cases and 2200 cyber incidents annually, while producing only a modest uptick in crimes against persons. Sustaining SDG 16.1 gains, therefore, requires an integrated package that simultaneously weakens the reinforcing loop – through youth jobs, social protection and digital-literacy programs – and strengthens the balancing loop via targeted cyber- and border-security measures.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 11(1)
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.