Numerical Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Mechanical Systems: A Literature Review

Uncertainty and reliability analyses are essential for evaluating the performance and safety of engineering systems subject to variability in parameters, operating conditions, and modeling assumptions. This paper presents a comprehensive review of classical and modern approaches for uncertainty quantification and reliability assessment. Three main methodological frameworks are addressed: probabilistic, fuzzy, and interval-based methods. Probabilistic approaches, such as the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), First-Order Reliability Method (FORM), and Second-Order Reliability Method (SORM), are discussed as rigorous tools for modeling randomness when sufficient statistical data are available. Fuzzy and interval methods are examined as alternatives to represent epistemic uncertainty when probabilistic information is limited or unavailable. The comparative analysis highlights the advantages, limitations, and applicability of each method in engineering contexts. The results emphasize that the choice of approach depends on the nature of uncertainty, data availability, and computational constraints. The study concludes that integrating probabilistic and non-probabilistic frameworks offers a promising pathway toward more robust and interpretable uncertainty analysis in complex systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/scielopreprints.13705
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Mechanical Systems: A Literature Review

Fabian Andres Lara-Molina
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Numerical Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Mechanical Systems: A Literature Review

Fabian Andres Lara-Molina
article en

Abstract

Uncertainty and reliability analyses are essential for evaluating the performance and safety of engineering systems subject to variability in parameters, operating conditions, and modeling assumptions. This paper presents a comprehensive review of classical and modern approaches for uncertainty quantification and reliability assessment. Three main methodological frameworks are addressed: probabilistic, fuzzy, and interval-based methods. Probabilistic approaches, such as the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), First-Order Reliability Method (FORM), and Second-Order Reliability Method (SORM), are discussed as rigorous tools for modeling randomness when sufficient statistical data are available. Fuzzy and interval methods are examined as alternatives to represent epistemic uncertainty when probabilistic information is limited or unavailable. The comparative analysis highlights the advantages, limitations, and applicability of each method in engineering contexts. The results emphasize that the choice of approach depends on the nature of uncertainty, data availability, and computational constraints. The study concludes that integrating probabilistic and non-probabilistic frameworks offers a promising pathway toward more robust and interpretable uncertainty analysis in complex systems.

Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.