The Role of Institutional Logics in Institutional Trust Formation: A Cognitive Frames Perspective

Institutions are central components of organizational and managerial life, and powerfully influence how individuals think, feel, and act toward one another in society. Because of their recognized importance, management and organizational scholars continue to wrestle with understanding core institutional trust dynamics. We review and extend past work on this issue by using a multi-disciplinary analysis of the institutional trust literature to focus on the important role that institutional logics play in institutional trust formation. Drawing on diverse disciplinary literatures, we identify four cognitive frames that stakeholders use to evaluate the trustworthiness of institutions. Building on this work, we distinguish three categories of mechanisms through which institutions engender trust. Following our review, we examine how the perspectives outlined here can be used to refine and extend research in this area by analyzing the impacts of contexts, multilevel influences, and competing logics on stakeholders’ institutional trust evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Annals
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2023.0103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Institutional Logics in Institutional Trust Formation: A Cognitive Frames Perspective

Sim B. Sitkin, Chris P. Long
1 citations
Academy of Management Annals
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
article

The Role of Institutional Logics in Institutional Trust Formation: A Cognitive Frames Perspective

Sim B. Sitkin, Chris P. Long
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Institutions are central components of organizational and managerial life, and powerfully influence how individuals think, feel, and act toward one another in society. Because of their recognized importance, management and organizational scholars continue to wrestle with understanding core institutional trust dynamics. We review and extend past work on this issue by using a multi-disciplinary analysis of the institutional trust literature to focus on the important role that institutional logics play in institutional trust formation. Drawing on diverse disciplinary literatures, we identify four cognitive frames that stakeholders use to evaluate the trustworthiness of institutions. Building on this work, we distinguish three categories of mechanisms through which institutions engender trust. Following our review, we examine how the perspectives outlined here can be used to refine and extend research in this area by analyzing the impacts of contexts, multilevel influences, and competing logics on stakeholders’ institutional trust evaluations.

Academy of Management AnnalsVol. 20(1)
Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Institutional Logics in Institutional Trust Formation: A Cognitive Frames Perspective — Sim B. Sitkin, Chris P. Long · Academy of Management Annals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS