Racial and ethnic differences in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis reversal and abandonment in the United States

Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV infection risks. However, adherence has been suboptimal across the United States (US), particularly among African Americans and Hispanic populations. We assessed racial and ethnic differences in PrEP primary non-adherence using two pharmacy-based measures: PrEP reversal (failure to pick up the first insurance-approved prescription) and PrEP abandonment (a reversed prescription not picked up within 365 days). Data from 2015 to 2019 were obtained from Symphony HealthCare Analytics, which covers approximately 75% of US PrEP claims. We analyzed PrEP reversal and abandonment rates among newly prescribed Black (non-Hispanic), White (non-Hispanic), and Hispanic adults using logistic regression with predicted margins to estimate unadjusted and adjusted rates. Among N = 21,653 adults, reversal rates were 23% for Black, and 19% for White and Hispanic, while abandonment rates were 17% for Black, 13% for White, and 12% for Hispanics. Across several sociodemographic characteristics, Black adults had higher unadjusted reversal and abandonment rates than White adults. Conversely, abandonment rates were lower in Hispanic compared to White adults. Lastly, after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, no significant assoications were found. The study suggests that factors other than race, including socioeconomic and structural determinants, may drive disparities in PrEP primary non-adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS Care
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2570853
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial and ethnic differences in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis reversal and abandonment in the United States

Philip A. Chan, Rahel Dawit, Amy Nunn, Lorraine Tiera Dean
AIDS Care
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Racial and ethnic differences in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis reversal and abandonment in the United States

Philip A. Chan, Rahel Dawit, Amy Nunn, Lorraine Tiera Dean
article en

Abstract

Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV infection risks. However, adherence has been suboptimal across the United States (US), particularly among African Americans and Hispanic populations. We assessed racial and ethnic differences in PrEP primary non-adherence using two pharmacy-based measures: PrEP reversal (failure to pick up the first insurance-approved prescription) and PrEP abandonment (a reversed prescription not picked up within 365 days). Data from 2015 to 2019 were obtained from Symphony HealthCare Analytics, which covers approximately 75% of US PrEP claims. We analyzed PrEP reversal and abandonment rates among newly prescribed Black (non-Hispanic), White (non-Hispanic), and Hispanic adults using logistic regression with predicted margins to estimate unadjusted and adjusted rates. Among N = 21,653 adults, reversal rates were 23% for Black, and 19% for White and Hispanic, while abandonment rates were 17% for Black, 13% for White, and 12% for Hispanics. Across several sociodemographic characteristics, Black adults had higher unadjusted reversal and abandonment rates than White adults. Conversely, abandonment rates were lower in Hispanic compared to White adults. Lastly, after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, no significant assoications were found. The study suggests that factors other than race, including socioeconomic and structural determinants, may drive disparities in PrEP primary non-adherence.

AIDS CareVol. 37(12)
Johns Hopkins University (US), John Brown University (US), Brown University (US), Miriam Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.