Performance Evaluation of the Elecsys HCV Duo Immunoassay in the Public Healthcare Setting in Cape Town, South Africa

Improved HCV diagnosis and linkage to care is crucial to achieve WHO 2030 elimination targets. Simplification of diagnostics remains key. We evaluated the performance of Elecsys HCV Duo antigen/antibody immunoassay in patients using public healthcare in Cape Town, South Africa. 253 HCV seropositive and 214 seronegative samples were tested, and results correlated with standard-of-care (SOC) serology, HCV RNA, viral genotype, patient demographics, and disease markers. Thirteen patients on antiviral therapy were also evaluated. Elecsys HCV Duo antibody was equivalent to SOC serology, while antigen had 100% negative percent agreement in non-viraemic samples. One incident infection with viral load (VL) of 54,000 IU/mL was antigen positive/antibody negative. Overall, antigen detection was 63.2% in RNA-positive samples. VL strongly predicted reactivity, with antigen positive rates of 17.5% (< 5 log IU/mL), 75.8% (5-6 log IU/mL), 89.4% (6-7 log IU/mL), and 100% (> 7 log IU/mL). Detection in genotype-1 infections was significantly better, at 69.6% (95% CI 59.5-79.7) than non-genotype-1 at 43.2% (95% CI 28.7-57.7). In treated patients, antigen mirrored RNA clearance but was only reliable if positive at baseline. Elecsys HCV Duo detected active infection in 63% of viraemic patients, 70% with genotype 1. In our cohort, 49% of new patients would require VL testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Viral Hepatitis
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.70095
Primary Topic
Hepatitis C virus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of the Elecsys HCV Duo Immunoassay in the Public Healthcare Setting in Cape Town, South Africa

Stephen N.J. Korsman, C Wendy Spearman, Russell Cable, Diana Hardie et al.
Journal of Viral Hepatitis
Hepatitis C virus research
article

Performance Evaluation of the Elecsys HCV Duo Immunoassay in the Public Healthcare Setting in Cape Town, South Africa

Stephen N.J. Korsman, C Wendy Spearman, Russell Cable, Diana Hardie, Nadia Petersen, Mark Wayne Sonderup, Ziyaad Valley‐Omar
article en

Abstract

Improved HCV diagnosis and linkage to care is crucial to achieve WHO 2030 elimination targets. Simplification of diagnostics remains key. We evaluated the performance of Elecsys HCV Duo antigen/antibody immunoassay in patients using public healthcare in Cape Town, South Africa. 253 HCV seropositive and 214 seronegative samples were tested, and results correlated with standard-of-care (SOC) serology, HCV RNA, viral genotype, patient demographics, and disease markers. Thirteen patients on antiviral therapy were also evaluated. Elecsys HCV Duo antibody was equivalent to SOC serology, while antigen had 100% negative percent agreement in non-viraemic samples. One incident infection with viral load (VL) of 54,000 IU/mL was antigen positive/antibody negative. Overall, antigen detection was 63.2% in RNA-positive samples. VL strongly predicted reactivity, with antigen positive rates of 17.5% (< 5 log IU/mL), 75.8% (5-6 log IU/mL), 89.4% (6-7 log IU/mL), and 100% (> 7 log IU/mL). Detection in genotype-1 infections was significantly better, at 69.6% (95% CI 59.5-79.7) than non-genotype-1 at 43.2% (95% CI 28.7-57.7). In treated patients, antigen mirrored RNA clearance but was only reliable if positive at baseline. Elecsys HCV Duo detected active infection in 63% of viraemic patients, 70% with genotype 1. In our cohort, 49% of new patients would require VL testing.

Journal of Viral HepatitisVol. 32(11)
National Health Laboratory Service (ZA), University of Cape Town (ZA), Groote Schuur Hospital (ZA), South African National Blood Service (ZA)
National Health Laboratory Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Hepatitis C virus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.