Does digital government promote collaborative innovation? Evidence from the e-government pilot policy in China

In the context of the digital economy, digital government construction is increasingly regarded as a vital approach to enhancing urban innovation governance. This study uses panel data from 292 prefecture-level and above cities in China spanning 2012-2023 and adopts a difference-in-differences (DID) model centered around the 2017 e-government pilot policy to systematically evaluate the impact of digital government on intra-city collaborative innovation. The findings reveal that: (1) the e-government policy significantly increased the frequency and scale of patent collaborations within cities, indicating its positive effect in stimulating multi-actor cooperation, optimizing factor allocation, and facilitating knowledge sharing; (2) mechanism analysis shows that digital government enhances fiscal efficiency and administrative transparency, strengthens targeted support for science and education sectors, and promotes the spatial agglomeration of innovation resources toward urban cores, thereby reducing collaboration costs and improving the efficiency of innovation networks; (3) heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy effect is more pronounced in highly market-oriented regions and non-provincial capital cities, reflecting differences in institutional adaptability and resource-driven incentives. The study provides micro-level empirical evidence for understanding the collaborative innovation effects of digital government and offers theoretical insights for regional governance and policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334131
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does digital government promote collaborative innovation? Evidence from the e-government pilot policy in China

Jiansheng You, Naiquan Liu, Jian Zhang, Yijie Li
PLoS ONE
E-Government and Public Services
article

Does digital government promote collaborative innovation? Evidence from the e-government pilot policy in China

Jiansheng You, Naiquan Liu, Jian Zhang, Yijie Li
article en

Abstract

In the context of the digital economy, digital government construction is increasingly regarded as a vital approach to enhancing urban innovation governance. This study uses panel data from 292 prefecture-level and above cities in China spanning 2012-2023 and adopts a difference-in-differences (DID) model centered around the 2017 e-government pilot policy to systematically evaluate the impact of digital government on intra-city collaborative innovation. The findings reveal that: (1) the e-government policy significantly increased the frequency and scale of patent collaborations within cities, indicating its positive effect in stimulating multi-actor cooperation, optimizing factor allocation, and facilitating knowledge sharing; (2) mechanism analysis shows that digital government enhances fiscal efficiency and administrative transparency, strengthens targeted support for science and education sectors, and promotes the spatial agglomeration of innovation resources toward urban cores, thereby reducing collaboration costs and improving the efficiency of innovation networks; (3) heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy effect is more pronounced in highly market-oriented regions and non-provincial capital cities, reflecting differences in institutional adaptability and resource-driven incentives. The study provides micro-level empirical evidence for understanding the collaborative innovation effects of digital government and offers theoretical insights for regional governance and policy design.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
Tongji University (CN), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.