Comparison of g-Estimation Approaches for Handling Symptomatic Medication at Multiple Timepoints in Alzheimer’s Disease with a Hypothetical Strategy

For handling intercurrent events in clinical trials, one of the strategies outlined in the ICH E9(R1) addendum targets a hypothetical scenario where an intercurrent event would not occur. While this strategy is often implemented by setting data after the intercurrent event to "missing" even if they have been collected, g-estimation allows for a more efficient estimation by using the information contained in post intercurrent event data. As the g-estimation methods have largely developed outside of randomized clinical trials, optimization for the application in clinical trials are possible. In this article, we describe and investigate the performance of modifications to the established g-estimation methods, leveraging the assumption that some intercurrent events are expected to have the same impact on the outcome regardless of the timing of their occurrence. In a simulation study in Alzheimer's disease, the modifications show a substantial efficiency advantage for the estimation of an estimand that applies the hypothetical strategy to the use of symptomatic treatment while retaining approximate unbiasedness and adequate Type I error control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2025.2573322
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of g-Estimation Approaches for Handling Symptomatic Medication at Multiple Timepoints in Alzheimer’s Disease with a Hypothetical Strategy

Wen Wei Loh, Florian Lasch, Lorenzo Guizzaro
Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Comparison of g-Estimation Approaches for Handling Symptomatic Medication at Multiple Timepoints in Alzheimer’s Disease with a Hypothetical Strategy

Wen Wei Loh, Florian Lasch, Lorenzo Guizzaro
article en

Abstract

For handling intercurrent events in clinical trials, one of the strategies outlined in the ICH E9(R1) addendum targets a hypothetical scenario where an intercurrent event would not occur. While this strategy is often implemented by setting data after the intercurrent event to "missing" even if they have been collected, g-estimation allows for a more efficient estimation by using the information contained in post intercurrent event data. As the g-estimation methods have largely developed outside of randomized clinical trials, optimization for the application in clinical trials are possible. In this article, we describe and investigate the performance of modifications to the established g-estimation methods, leveraging the assumption that some intercurrent events are expected to have the same impact on the outcome regardless of the timing of their occurrence. In a simulation study in Alzheimer's disease, the modifications show a substantial efficiency advantage for the estimation of an estimand that applies the hypothetical strategy to the use of symptomatic treatment while retaining approximate unbiasedness and adequate Type I error control.

Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
European Medicines Agency (NL), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Maastricht University (NL), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.