Missing the human touch?

Abstract Existing research suggests that machine translations of literary texts remain unsatisfactory. Such quality assessment often relies on automated metrics and subjective human ratings, with little attention to the stylistic features of machine translation. Current understanding is limited regarding the extent to which AI may transform the literary translation landscape, with implications for other critical domains for translation such as the creative industries more broadly. This pioneering study investigates the stylistic features of AI translations, specifically examining GPT-4’s performance against human translations of Chinese online literature. Our computational stylometry analysis reveals that GPT-4 translations closely mirror human translations in lexical, syntactic and content features. In addition to showing the relevance of stylometry for analysing the features of AI translation, the study provides critical insights into the implications of AI for literary translation in the posthuman tradition, where the line between machine and human translation becomes increasingly blurry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translation Spaces
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.24043.yao
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Missing the human touch?

Yong‐Bin Kang, Xiaofang Yao, Anthony McCosker
Translation Spaces
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Missing the human touch?

Yong‐Bin Kang, Xiaofang Yao, Anthony McCosker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Existing research suggests that machine translations of literary texts remain unsatisfactory. Such quality assessment often relies on automated metrics and subjective human ratings, with little attention to the stylistic features of machine translation. Current understanding is limited regarding the extent to which AI may transform the literary translation landscape, with implications for other critical domains for translation such as the creative industries more broadly. This pioneering study investigates the stylistic features of AI translations, specifically examining GPT-4’s performance against human translations of Chinese online literature. Our computational stylometry analysis reveals that GPT-4 translations closely mirror human translations in lexical, syntactic and content features. In addition to showing the relevance of stylometry for analysing the features of AI translation, the study provides critical insights into the implications of AI for literary translation in the posthuman tradition, where the line between machine and human translation becomes increasingly blurry.

Translation SpacesVol. 14(2)
University of Groningen (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Missing the human touch? — Yong‐Bin Kang, Xiaofang Yao, et al. · Translation Spaces (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS