Bridging the Gaps: A Comprehensive Review of Data Management Capability Maturity Models in the Digital Era

As digital transformation accelerates, organisations are increasingly investing in data management infrastructures and setting related strategic goals. However, expected returns are often not realised due to ineffective data management practices. To address this, Capability Maturity Models (CMMs) have been developed to assess and enhance data management capabilities across areas such as strategy, policy, leadership, culture, processes, and value-added activities. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) covering 28 studies published between 2012 and 2022, with an additional snowballing extension up to January 2024 related to data management maturity, encompassing both fully established Capability Maturity Models (CMMs) and conceptually significant contributions. The studies were evaluated based on two main criteria: (1) the application of a Design Science approach, comprising four key steps-problem definition, comparison of existing models, model development, and evaluation; and (2) the comprehensiveness, clarity, and usability of the models, assessed through four sub-criteria. The analysis identified eleven major shortcomings in the existing literature, including limited synthesis of prior work, lack of scientifically grounded iterative development, insufficient validation and verification, and inadequate coverage of the complete data lifecycle-particularly in relation to legal and ISO compliance. Moreover, critical elements such as a Stage 0 for data awareness, transition tables, and practical self-assessment schemes were often missing. These findings underscore the need for a scientifically rigorous and practically applicable CMM that addresses these gaps and offers a holistic framework for advancing data management maturity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Big Data
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tbdata.2025.3621149
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Gaps: A Comprehensive Review of Data Management Capability Maturity Models in the Digital Era

Shuo Yan, Jeff A. Jones
IEEE Transactions on Big Data
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

Bridging the Gaps: A Comprehensive Review of Data Management Capability Maturity Models in the Digital Era

Shuo Yan, Jeff A. Jones
article en

Abstract

As digital transformation accelerates, organisations are increasingly investing in data management infrastructures and setting related strategic goals. However, expected returns are often not realised due to ineffective data management practices. To address this, Capability Maturity Models (CMMs) have been developed to assess and enhance data management capabilities across areas such as strategy, policy, leadership, culture, processes, and value-added activities. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) covering 28 studies published between 2012 and 2022, with an additional snowballing extension up to January 2024 related to data management maturity, encompassing both fully established Capability Maturity Models (CMMs) and conceptually significant contributions. The studies were evaluated based on two main criteria: (1) the application of a Design Science approach, comprising four key steps-problem definition, comparison of existing models, model development, and evaluation; and (2) the comprehensiveness, clarity, and usability of the models, assessed through four sub-criteria. The analysis identified eleven major shortcomings in the existing literature, including limited synthesis of prior work, lack of scientifically grounded iterative development, insufficient validation and verification, and inadequate coverage of the complete data lifecycle-particularly in relation to legal and ISO compliance. Moreover, critical elements such as a Stage 0 for data awareness, transition tables, and practical self-assessment schemes were often missing. These findings underscore the need for a scientifically rigorous and practically applicable CMM that addresses these gaps and offers a holistic framework for advancing data management maturity.

IEEE Transactions on Big DataVol. 12(2)
University of Warwick (GB), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.