A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPAL CRIMINAL ACTION OF MONEY IN THE FORM OF SUBSTITUTE CRIMINAL (Study of Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number 110 K/Pid.Sus/2024)

Payment of replacement money in corruption cases can save state money that has been corrupted. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the mechanism for payment of replacement money to return state losses in corruption cases, the obstacles faced in the process of payment of replacement money to return state losses in corruption cases, how the legal considerations of judges in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 110 K / Pid.Sus / 2024 related to payment of replacement money to return state losses in corruption cases. The results of the study, namely the obstacles faced in the process of paying substitute money to return state losses in corruption cases, are that the handling of corruption cases has been carried out in an extraordinary manner, but there are still obstacles concerning the confiscation of assets that do not yet have a legal umbrella, confiscation of assets, and audits of the calculation of state financial losses that do not reach the level of the flow of money and the Perception of the Executing Prosecutor regarding the Judge's verdict. The legal consideration of the judge in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 110 K/Pid.Sus/2024 regarding the payment of replacement money for the return of state losses in corruption cases is that the defendant has enjoyed money from the crime, so based on Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, the Defendant is sentenced to pay replacement money converted with money that the Defendant has deposited with the Public Prosecutor