Tanggung Jawab Hukum Tokopedia Terhadap Konsumen Atas Ketidaksesuaian Barang Dalam Jual Beli Online

This study discusses Tokopedia's legal responsibility towards consumers for non-conformity of goods in online sales transactions. Although regulations regarding electronic commerce have been established, there are still weaknesses in consumer legal protection. Consumers often experience losses due to goods received that do not match the description without receiving proper compensation. This study uses a normative-empirical method with a regulatory-statutory approach and case studies to analyze Tokopedia's responsibility and legal protection for consumers in electronic transactions. The study results indicate that the available settlement mechanisms, such as online dispute resolution, have not fully provided justice for consumers. Tokopedia, as a platform provider, is responsible for ensuring that consumer rights are protected and providing more effective settlement solutions. In addition, consumer legal awareness of their rights in electronic transactions is still low, so they are willing to take their position in dealing with sales with sellers. This study highlights the need to strengthen regulations and implement more effective consumer legal protection in the e-commerce ecosystem. An active role is needed from the government and e-commerce platforms to ensure a transparent complaint mechanism supporting consumer protection to create a safer and fairer digital trade ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v6i2.22618
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Tokopedia Terhadap Konsumen Atas Ketidaksesuaian Barang Dalam Jual Beli Online

Zahra Rahmawati
JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Tokopedia Terhadap Konsumen Atas Ketidaksesuaian Barang Dalam Jual Beli Online

Zahra Rahmawati
article en

Abstract

This study discusses Tokopedia's legal responsibility towards consumers for non-conformity of goods in online sales transactions. Although regulations regarding electronic commerce have been established, there are still weaknesses in consumer legal protection. Consumers often experience losses due to goods received that do not match the description without receiving proper compensation. This study uses a normative-empirical method with a regulatory-statutory approach and case studies to analyze Tokopedia's responsibility and legal protection for consumers in electronic transactions. The study results indicate that the available settlement mechanisms, such as online dispute resolution, have not fully provided justice for consumers. Tokopedia, as a platform provider, is responsible for ensuring that consumer rights are protected and providing more effective settlement solutions. In addition, consumer legal awareness of their rights in electronic transactions is still low, so they are willing to take their position in dealing with sales with sellers. This study highlights the need to strengthen regulations and implement more effective consumer legal protection in the e-commerce ecosystem. An active role is needed from the government and e-commerce platforms to ensure a transparent complaint mechanism supporting consumer protection to create a safer and fairer digital trade ecosystem.

JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCHVol. 6(2)
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.