The Social Sources Adolescents Consult for Daily Life Choices: Variations in Age and Decision Domains

This study emphasises adolescents' active role in seeking advice from peers to inform their decisions related to risky-, prosocial-, and academic behaviour. Across all domains, adolescents prioritise guidance from (close) friends and peers they trust. Characteristics related to the social status of a peer, and perceived intelligence, also contribute to someone being consulted for advice. The type of peers adolescents prefer to consult appears to be more consistent across domains than highly domain-specific. However, the increased bias for friends with age was absent for academic choices. Future studies should aim to better understand adolescents' motives for consulting certain peers and should investigate the extent to which a peer's knowledge and skills play a role. These insights are essential for evaluating the suitability of peers as information sources across various decision domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Adolescence
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70063
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Sources Adolescents Consult for Daily Life Choices: Variations in Age and Decision Domains

Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde, Scarlett K. Slagter, Wouter van den Bos
Journal of Adolescence
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

The Social Sources Adolescents Consult for Daily Life Choices: Variations in Age and Decision Domains

Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde, Scarlett K. Slagter, Wouter van den Bos
article en

Abstract

This study emphasises adolescents' active role in seeking advice from peers to inform their decisions related to risky-, prosocial-, and academic behaviour. Across all domains, adolescents prioritise guidance from (close) friends and peers they trust. Characteristics related to the social status of a peer, and perceived intelligence, also contribute to someone being consulted for advice. The type of peers adolescents prefer to consult appears to be more consistent across domains than highly domain-specific. However, the increased bias for friends with age was absent for academic choices. Future studies should aim to better understand adolescents' motives for consulting certain peers and should investigate the extent to which a peer's knowledge and skills play a role. These insights are essential for evaluating the suitability of peers as information sources across various decision domains.

Journal of AdolescenceVol. 98(1)
Leiden University (NL), Max Planck Society (DE), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), Dissens – Institut für Bildung und Forschung (DE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.