Assessing the Assessments: Do Preceptor Evaluations Predict Physician Assistant National Certifying Exam and End of Rotation Performance?
Despite some statistically significant correlations, the practical utility of preceptor evaluations in predicting standardized exam performance is negligible. This suggests that preceptor evaluations, although essential to evaluate for clinical competencies beyond standardized evaluations, may not be predictive of academic student success. Preceptor evaluations reveal a weak correlation, when present, with standardized examinations. These findings prompt reflection upon the traditional reliance on preceptor evaluations and suggest that future research is needed at both the programmatic and national levels to capture a comprehensive understanding of student competence as a future clinician.
Authors
- Simon Jameson
- Mitchell J. Barnett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9645-9865)
- Jaclyn Demeter
- Andrew P Chastain
- Christopher Roman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9185-4532)
- Jennifer Guthrie
- Hannah Wright (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1417-2643)
- Kevin Bogenschutz
- Michael Sulewski
Institutions
- Butler University (US)
- Apple (Israel) (IL)
- Wingate University (US)
- Cardiovascular Institute of the South (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Physician Assistant Education
- Published
- 2025-10-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/jpa.0000000000000716
- Primary Topic
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00