AI-assisted Living Evidence Databases for Conservation Science

Living evidence databases offer a robust and dynamic alternative to static systematic reviews but require a resilient technical infrastructure for continuous evidence processing. This working paper describes the architecture and implementation of a complete, end-to-end pipeline for this purpose, developed initially for the conservation science domain. Designed to operate on local infrastructure using self-hosted models, the system ingests and normalizes documents from academic publishers, screens them for relevance using a multi-stage process, and extracts structured data according to a predefined schema. Key features include a hybrid retrieval model; a human-AI collaborative process for refining inclusion criteria from complex protocols, and the integration of an established, statistically-principled stopping rule to ensure efficiency. In a baseline evaluation against a prior large-scale manual review, the fully automated pipeline achieved 97% recall and identified a significant number of relevant studies not included in the original review, demonstrating its viability as a foundational tool for maintaining living evidence databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-rmsqf
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-assisted Living Evidence Databases for Conservation Science

Anil Madhavapeddy, Sadiq Jaffer, William H. Morgan, S.A. Reynolds et al.
21 citations
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
26.80
article

AI-assisted Living Evidence Databases for Conservation Science

Anil Madhavapeddy, Sadiq Jaffer, William H. Morgan, S.A. Reynolds, William J. Sutherland
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Living evidence databases offer a robust and dynamic alternative to static systematic reviews but require a resilient technical infrastructure for continuous evidence processing. This working paper describes the architecture and implementation of a complete, end-to-end pipeline for this purpose, developed initially for the conservation science domain. Designed to operate on local infrastructure using self-hosted models, the system ingests and normalizes documents from academic publishers, screens them for relevance using a multi-stage process, and extracts structured data according to a predefined schema. Key features include a hybrid retrieval model; a human-AI collaborative process for refining inclusion criteria from complex protocols, and the integration of an established, statistically-principled stopping rule to ensure efficiency. In a baseline evaluation against a prior large-scale manual review, the fully automated pipeline achieved 97% recall and identified a significant number of relevant studies not included in the original review, demonstrating its viability as a foundational tool for maintaining living evidence databases.

University of Cambridge (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
26.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.