AI-assisted Living Evidence Databases for Conservation Science
Living evidence databases offer a robust and dynamic alternative to static systematic reviews but require a resilient technical infrastructure for continuous evidence processing. This working paper describes the architecture and implementation of a complete, end-to-end pipeline for this purpose, developed initially for the conservation science domain. Designed to operate on local infrastructure using self-hosted models, the system ingests and normalizes documents from academic publishers, screens them for relevance using a multi-stage process, and extracts structured data according to a predefined schema. Key features include a hybrid retrieval model; a human-AI collaborative process for refining inclusion criteria from complex protocols, and the integration of an established, statistically-principled stopping rule to ensure efficiency. In a baseline evaluation against a prior large-scale manual review, the fully automated pipeline achieved 97% recall and identified a significant number of relevant studies not included in the original review, demonstrating its viability as a foundational tool for maintaining living evidence databases.
Authors
- Anil Madhavapeddy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8954-2428)
- Sadiq Jaffer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4120-3244)
- William H. Morgan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7594-6453)
- S.A. Reynolds (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1255-580X)
- William J. Sutherland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-0437)
Institutions
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-10-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-rmsqf
- Citations
- 21
- Primary Topic
- Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 26.80