Safety of immunotherapy after liver transplantation—A multicenter study of a prospective standardized clinical practice protocol

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer prognosis significantly, but their use has been avoided in liver transplant recipients (LTr) due to poorly characterized rejection risk. Data surrounding rejection risk are extremely suboptimal, with highly variable immunosuppression approaches and follow-up, and do not account for the learning curve in managing immunosuppression in the setting of ICI. A standardized institutional clinical practice protocol was developed in 2021 for immunosuppression management to facilitate ICI therapy with prospective close follow-up for immunosuppression levels and allograft function. Of 20 LTr, 12 (60%) were male, 18 (90%) were Caucasian, with a mean age of 54.0 (SD 11.2) years. However, 13/20 had 2 or more failed cancer therapies before ICI. Hepatocellular carcinoma ​(HCC) (N=7), lung (N=3), and melanoma (N=3) were the most frequent. Time from first ICI treatment to death was <30 days (N=5), 30-59 days (N=4), 60-89 days (N=1), and >90 days (N=6). Most deaths were cancer-related, reflecting the late stage of disease. ICI toxicity occurred in 3 LTr; pneumonitis (N=1, 5%), myocarditis (N=1, 5%), and acute cellular rejection (N=1, 5%). Four patients remain alive 178-341 days with stable allograft function and slow reduction in immunosuppression. Three out of 4 patients have a partial cancer response, and 1 with slowed progression of disease. ICI treatment in the immunosuppressed LTr is feasible with careful immunosuppression management and follow-up. Demonstrating a low rejection risk should allow for earlier utilization of these agents to improve cancer prognosis. Optimizing rejection risk with cancer response requires ongoing study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Transplantation
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lvt.0000000000000749
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety of immunotherapy after liver transplantation—A multicenter study of a prospective standardized clinical practice protocol

Hassan Azhari, D Rusch, Kymberly D. Watt, David M. Chascsa et al.
3 citations
Liver Transplantation
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
5.96
article

Safety of immunotherapy after liver transplantation—A multicenter study of a prospective standardized clinical practice protocol

Hassan Azhari, D Rusch, Kymberly D. Watt, David M. Chascsa, Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa, Amanda L. Tapia, Susen Kumar Panda, Valeria Pierluissi, Rachel Abarca
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer prognosis significantly, but their use has been avoided in liver transplant recipients (LTr) due to poorly characterized rejection risk. Data surrounding rejection risk are extremely suboptimal, with highly variable immunosuppression approaches and follow-up, and do not account for the learning curve in managing immunosuppression in the setting of ICI. A standardized institutional clinical practice protocol was developed in 2021 for immunosuppression management to facilitate ICI therapy with prospective close follow-up for immunosuppression levels and allograft function. Of 20 LTr, 12 (60%) were male, 18 (90%) were Caucasian, with a mean age of 54.0 (SD 11.2) years. However, 13/20 had 2 or more failed cancer therapies before ICI. Hepatocellular carcinoma ​(HCC) (N=7), lung (N=3), and melanoma (N=3) were the most frequent. Time from first ICI treatment to death was <30 days (N=5), 30-59 days (N=4), 60-89 days (N=1), and >90 days (N=6). Most deaths were cancer-related, reflecting the late stage of disease. ICI toxicity occurred in 3 LTr; pneumonitis (N=1, 5%), myocarditis (N=1, 5%), and acute cellular rejection (N=1, 5%). Four patients remain alive 178-341 days with stable allograft function and slow reduction in immunosuppression. Three out of 4 patients have a partial cancer response, and 1 with slowed progression of disease. ICI treatment in the immunosuppressed LTr is feasible with careful immunosuppression management and follow-up. Demonstrating a low rejection risk should allow for earlier utilization of these agents to improve cancer prognosis. Optimizing rejection risk with cancer response requires ongoing study.

Liver Transplantation
Mayo Clinic (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Cornell University (US), WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
5.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.