A Uniform Approach to Contract Formation and Interpretation

This is a revised and footnoted version of the Sir Ivor Richardson Lecture delivered at Victoria University of Wellington on 4 September 2024. Professor McLauchlan argues that when we ask the questions "is there a contract?" and, if so, "what does it mean?", essentially the same principles apply in New Zealand as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Bathurst Resources Ltd v L&M Coal Holdings Ltd. This represents a departure from the law in other common law countries, notably the United Kingdom and Australia, where the courts continue to draw a sharp distinction between the principles governing formation of contracts and those governing their interpretation. Nevertheless, Professor McLauchlan suggests that the New Zealand development is to be welcomed because it improves the transparency and coherence of the law of contract and brings that law into line with the best international practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Victoria University of Wellington Law Review
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v56i1.10280
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Uniform Approach to Contract Formation and Interpretation

David McLauchlan
Victoria University of Wellington Law Review
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

A Uniform Approach to Contract Formation and Interpretation

David McLauchlan
article en

Abstract

This is a revised and footnoted version of the Sir Ivor Richardson Lecture delivered at Victoria University of Wellington on 4 September 2024. Professor McLauchlan argues that when we ask the questions "is there a contract?" and, if so, "what does it mean?", essentially the same principles apply in New Zealand as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Bathurst Resources Ltd v L&M Coal Holdings Ltd. This represents a departure from the law in other common law countries, notably the United Kingdom and Australia, where the courts continue to draw a sharp distinction between the principles governing formation of contracts and those governing their interpretation. Nevertheless, Professor McLauchlan suggests that the New Zealand development is to be welcomed because it improves the transparency and coherence of the law of contract and brings that law into line with the best international practice.

Victoria University of Wellington Law ReviewVol. 56(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.