Views from chief veterinary officers about decision making during animal health emergencies: A qualitative analysis

This study's objectives were to investigate how delegates of the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), particularly chief veterinary officers (CVOs), make decisions requiring immediate action, having national/international impacts on animal health and welfare and/or human health, and how the process creates new policies and practices. We interviewed 33 CVOs from 6 continents, on their background, jurisdiction, institutional structures, and decision-making processes, including types of decisions made, who they consulted, information used (and wished they knew), political, public and other influences, and resultant policy changes. The CVOs also discussed surprising and challenging phenomena, and what they learned. Qualitative analysis was conducted on interview transcriptions. Most CVOs had similar decision-making processes. They followed established protocols and national legislation aligned with WOAH international standards, relying on multidisciplinary teams of experts in science, economics, policy, and law, and those with knowledge of local field conditions, for guidance. Insufficient information and conflict between scientific evidence and political/economic pressure were common themes. Although stressful, most CVOs were committed to their work and felt they made valuable contributions towards both animal and human health. The findings suggest that regardless of background or specific geographical context, CVOs follow established protocols and need to have the ability to make informed subjective judgements as part of their decision making. Thus, CVO qualifications include subject matter knowledge and specific leadership qualities, which need to be considered when making CVO appointments. Presently, veterinarians receive inadequate training on integrating evidence and other factors to make informed, 'good' decisions. This study's findings should be considered when developing the educational programs for veterinary students and established practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106721
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Views from chief veterinary officers about decision making during animal health emergencies: A qualitative analysis

J.A. Hertl, Guillaume Lhermie, Gregorio Torres, Elizabeth Fox et al.
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

Views from chief veterinary officers about decision making during animal health emergencies: A qualitative analysis

J.A. Hertl, Guillaume Lhermie, Gregorio Torres, Elizabeth Fox, Yrjö T. Gröhn, Dirk Pfeiffer
article en

Abstract

This study's objectives were to investigate how delegates of the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), particularly chief veterinary officers (CVOs), make decisions requiring immediate action, having national/international impacts on animal health and welfare and/or human health, and how the process creates new policies and practices. We interviewed 33 CVOs from 6 continents, on their background, jurisdiction, institutional structures, and decision-making processes, including types of decisions made, who they consulted, information used (and wished they knew), political, public and other influences, and resultant policy changes. The CVOs also discussed surprising and challenging phenomena, and what they learned. Qualitative analysis was conducted on interview transcriptions. Most CVOs had similar decision-making processes. They followed established protocols and national legislation aligned with WOAH international standards, relying on multidisciplinary teams of experts in science, economics, policy, and law, and those with knowledge of local field conditions, for guidance. Insufficient information and conflict between scientific evidence and political/economic pressure were common themes. Although stressful, most CVOs were committed to their work and felt they made valuable contributions towards both animal and human health. The findings suggest that regardless of background or specific geographical context, CVOs follow established protocols and need to have the ability to make informed subjective judgements as part of their decision making. Thus, CVO qualifications include subject matter knowledge and specific leadership qualities, which need to be considered when making CVO appointments. Presently, veterinarians receive inadequate training on integrating evidence and other factors to make informed, 'good' decisions. This study's findings should be considered when developing the educational programs for veterinary students and established practitioners.

Preventive Veterinary MedicineVol. 246
Department of Health (CN), University of Calgary (CA), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Cornell University (US), New York State College of Veterinary Medicine (US), Organisation Mondiale de la Santé Animale (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.