Product Positioning and Incentives to Innovate

ABSTRACT This paper shows that product positioning affects the incentives to invest in process innovation. The result is found using a model of price competition with three firms under horizontal product differentiation—and then extended to a more general Bertrand triopoly. The central firm may have a higher gain from a cost reduction than the peripheral firms, even if it reaps a lower profit or has a lower demand. By contrast, the peripheral firms have a larger gain if, and only if, they also have larger profits. Furthermore, we argue that the central firm exploits a reduction in the marginal cost mainly to expand its sales, whereas the peripheral ones to increase their markup. We finally show that the aggregate innovation incentives are larger the more clustered toward the center are the firms and the larger the preinnovation cost asymmetry. We also analyze the effects of mergers on innovation incentives, confirming that they tend to reduce the merged firms' incentives to innovate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.70011
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Product Positioning and Incentives to Innovate

Paolo G. Garella, Emanuele Bacchiega
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Product Positioning and Incentives to Innovate

Paolo G. Garella, Emanuele Bacchiega
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper shows that product positioning affects the incentives to invest in process innovation. The result is found using a model of price competition with three firms under horizontal product differentiation—and then extended to a more general Bertrand triopoly. The central firm may have a higher gain from a cost reduction than the peripheral firms, even if it reaps a lower profit or has a lower demand. By contrast, the peripheral firms have a larger gain if, and only if, they also have larger profits. Furthermore, we argue that the central firm exploits a reduction in the marginal cost mainly to expand its sales, whereas the peripheral ones to increase their markup. We finally show that the aggregate innovation incentives are larger the more clustered toward the center are the firms and the larger the preinnovation cost asymmetry. We also analyze the effects of mergers on innovation incentives, confirming that they tend to reduce the merged firms' incentives to innovate.

Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Humanitas University (IT), University of Milan (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.