Distinct trajectory of post-fire GPP across forest types in Siberia

Abstract Wildfire is one of the dominant disturbances in the Siberian boreal forest, affecting the capacity of forests to uptake carbon. Impacts of wildfires on forest carbon uptake are substantially varied by tree compositions, however, the loss of carbon uptake capability across different forest types remains uncertain. Here, we tracked post-fire changes in gross primary production (GPP) across five forest types in Siberia, namely, evergreen needleleaf forests (ENF), deciduous needleleaf forests (DNF), deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF), mixed forests (MF), and woody savannas (WSVN), using satellite-based observation data from 2001 to 2023. Results revealed substantial reductions in GPP after wildfire followed by gradual recovery except DBF. The GPP changes one year after wildfire (ΔGPP 1yr ) and recovery rates of GPP notably differed by forest types. In ENF, ΔGPP 1yr reached −63.4 g C m −2 yr −1 , which is larger than that in MF, DNF, and WSVN by −20.6, −31.3, and −42.7 g C m −2 yr −1 , respectively. Consistently, the GPP recovery rate is the lowest in ENF, at 63.7%. Furthermore, significant decreasing trends in 5-year mean of ΔGPP 1 yr in DNF, MF, and WSVN exceed −1.0 g C m −2 yr −1 yr −1 , indicating intensified impacts of increased wildfire intensity and/or extent on forest carbon. Our findings highlight the urgent need for establishing fire management and forest recovery strategies adapted to different forest types to enhance ecosystem resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae1245
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct trajectory of post-fire GPP across forest types in Siberia

Sujong Jeong, Chang‐Eui Park, Jin‐Soo Kim, Ahreum Lee
Environmental Research Letters
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Distinct trajectory of post-fire GPP across forest types in Siberia

Sujong Jeong, Chang‐Eui Park, Jin‐Soo Kim, Ahreum Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wildfire is one of the dominant disturbances in the Siberian boreal forest, affecting the capacity of forests to uptake carbon. Impacts of wildfires on forest carbon uptake are substantially varied by tree compositions, however, the loss of carbon uptake capability across different forest types remains uncertain. Here, we tracked post-fire changes in gross primary production (GPP) across five forest types in Siberia, namely, evergreen needleleaf forests (ENF), deciduous needleleaf forests (DNF), deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF), mixed forests (MF), and woody savannas (WSVN), using satellite-based observation data from 2001 to 2023. Results revealed substantial reductions in GPP after wildfire followed by gradual recovery except DBF. The GPP changes one year after wildfire (ΔGPP 1yr ) and recovery rates of GPP notably differed by forest types. In ENF, ΔGPP 1yr reached −63.4 g C m −2 yr −1 , which is larger than that in MF, DNF, and WSVN by −20.6, −31.3, and −42.7 g C m −2 yr −1 , respectively. Consistently, the GPP recovery rate is the lowest in ENF, at 63.7%. Furthermore, significant decreasing trends in 5-year mean of ΔGPP 1 yr in DNF, MF, and WSVN exceed −1.0 g C m −2 yr −1 yr −1 , indicating intensified impacts of increased wildfire intensity and/or extent on forest carbon. Our findings highlight the urgent need for establishing fire management and forest recovery strategies adapted to different forest types to enhance ecosystem resilience.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(11)
Seoul National University (KR), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.