Co-constructing adaptive lesson plans with GenAI: Pre-service teachers' Intelligent-TPACK and prompt engineering strategies

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies present new opportunities for teachers to design adaptive and student-centered instruction. However, the educational value of GenAI depends not only on technical usage but also on teachers’ ability to formulate pedagogically meaningful prompts. Prompting strategies are not isolated from teachers` prior knowledge and skills. Less is known about how pre-service teachers` AI-related knowledge influences prompt engineering strategies, in turn leading to meaningful adaptive lesson plans. Considering this gap, we design an instructional task for pre-service teachers to generate adaptive lesson plans with the help of GenAI. Prior to the task, we collected data about their AI-related skills, namely AI literacy and Intelligent-TPACK. The prompts were qualitatively analyzed based on the phases of the Knowledge Construction (KC) Framework. Then, we explored the pedagogical value of adaptive lesson plans through a rubric in terms of three indicators: student agency, adaptive strategies, and flexible tools. PLS-SEM analysis revealed that as long as pre-service teachers have AI-specific technological and pedagogical knowledge, they formulate higher phases of prompts based on the KC framework. Our analysis showed that prompts from higher phases generated more adaptive lesson plans in terms of student agency, adaptive strategies, and flexible tools. We also found an indirect effect of Intelligent-TPK on adaptive lesson plans. This study highlights that effective prompt engineering is a pedagogical act shaped by teachers’ knowledge, not merely a technical command. It also underscores the importance of embedding AI-specific pedagogical training in teacher education. By conceptualizing prompts as epistemic moves, we offer new insights into how teachers and GenAI can collaborate to produce responsive and inclusive learning experiences. • Knowledge Construction Framework can guide the process of prompting. • Pre-service teachers` prior knowledge is related to prompt engineering strategies. • GenAI-specific technological and pedagogical knowledge is crucial for prompting. • GenAI-generated adaptive lesson plans are associated with prompting strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Education
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105485
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-constructing adaptive lesson plans with GenAI: Pre-service teachers' Intelligent-TPACK and prompt engineering strategies

İsmail Çelik, Sini Kontkanen, Jari Laru, Alanur Ahsen Dalyanci
4 citations
Computers & Education
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
9.92
article

Co-constructing adaptive lesson plans with GenAI: Pre-service teachers' Intelligent-TPACK and prompt engineering strategies

İsmail Çelik, Sini Kontkanen, Jari Laru, Alanur Ahsen Dalyanci
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies present new opportunities for teachers to design adaptive and student-centered instruction. However, the educational value of GenAI depends not only on technical usage but also on teachers’ ability to formulate pedagogically meaningful prompts. Prompting strategies are not isolated from teachers` prior knowledge and skills. Less is known about how pre-service teachers` AI-related knowledge influences prompt engineering strategies, in turn leading to meaningful adaptive lesson plans. Considering this gap, we design an instructional task for pre-service teachers to generate adaptive lesson plans with the help of GenAI. Prior to the task, we collected data about their AI-related skills, namely AI literacy and Intelligent-TPACK. The prompts were qualitatively analyzed based on the phases of the Knowledge Construction (KC) Framework. Then, we explored the pedagogical value of adaptive lesson plans through a rubric in terms of three indicators: student agency, adaptive strategies, and flexible tools. PLS-SEM analysis revealed that as long as pre-service teachers have AI-specific technological and pedagogical knowledge, they formulate higher phases of prompts based on the KC framework. Our analysis showed that prompts from higher phases generated more adaptive lesson plans in terms of student agency, adaptive strategies, and flexible tools. We also found an indirect effect of Intelligent-TPK on adaptive lesson plans. This study highlights that effective prompt engineering is a pedagogical act shaped by teachers’ knowledge, not merely a technical command. It also underscores the importance of embedding AI-specific pedagogical training in teacher education. By conceptualizing prompts as epistemic moves, we offer new insights into how teachers and GenAI can collaborate to produce responsive and inclusive learning experiences. • Knowledge Construction Framework can guide the process of prompting. • Pre-service teachers` prior knowledge is related to prompt engineering strategies. • GenAI-specific technological and pedagogical knowledge is crucial for prompting. • GenAI-generated adaptive lesson plans are associated with prompting strategies.

Computers & EducationVol. 241
Research Council of Finland (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finland University (FI), Oulu University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.