Connecting standards and theoretical models for minimum ignition energy Estimation: a procedure to optimize the number of experimental tests

Dust explosions pose a significant concern in the process industry, particularly in the context of risk assessment. Such explosions can be initiated by various ignition sources, including electrical (e.g., static discharges, arcs, equipment-generated sparks) and thermal (e.g., hot surfaces, flame pockets) triggers. Assessing the likelihood and severity of dust explosions is inherently complex. However, the experimental determination of key dust parameters can greatly support the risk evaluation process. Among these parameters, electrical resistivity and Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) are crucial. Unfortunately, a regular MIE testing demands up to 1 kg of powder, and no existing standard outlines how to reduce the number of required tests. However, EN ISO/IEC 80079-20-2 does not require to carry out a full screening on every possible combination of parameters, but to identify non-combustion and combustion regions. In this framework, theoretical models may offer preliminary MIE estimates, optimizing the experimental procedure. This study proposes a screening flow chart that integrates MIE and electrical resistivity values along with process-specific information (e.g., quantity of dust handled, presence of ignition sources). The aim is to prioritize potentially hazardous substances in the plant for detailed safety evaluation. The advantages and limitations of the proposed flow chart are also discussed. • A simplified protocol enables early ignition risk assessment with minimal dust quantities. • Ignition Energy (IE) is proposed as a surrogate for MIE in preliminary screenings. • The method supports classification by process type and dust quantity. • Safety measures are tailored to the assessed risk level of each scenario. • The approach encourages broader adoption of dust testing in industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Electrostatics
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2025.104196
Primary Topic
Combustion and Detonation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting standards and theoretical models for minimum ignition energy Estimation: a procedure to optimize the number of experimental tests

Martina Silvia Scotton, Sabrina Copelli, Marco Barozzi, Davide Ballinari
Journal of Electrostatics
Combustion and Detonation Processes
article

Connecting standards and theoretical models for minimum ignition energy Estimation: a procedure to optimize the number of experimental tests

Martina Silvia Scotton, Sabrina Copelli, Marco Barozzi, Davide Ballinari
article en

Abstract

Dust explosions pose a significant concern in the process industry, particularly in the context of risk assessment. Such explosions can be initiated by various ignition sources, including electrical (e.g., static discharges, arcs, equipment-generated sparks) and thermal (e.g., hot surfaces, flame pockets) triggers. Assessing the likelihood and severity of dust explosions is inherently complex. However, the experimental determination of key dust parameters can greatly support the risk evaluation process. Among these parameters, electrical resistivity and Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) are crucial. Unfortunately, a regular MIE testing demands up to 1 kg of powder, and no existing standard outlines how to reduce the number of required tests. However, EN ISO/IEC 80079-20-2 does not require to carry out a full screening on every possible combination of parameters, but to identify non-combustion and combustion regions. In this framework, theoretical models may offer preliminary MIE estimates, optimizing the experimental procedure. This study proposes a screening flow chart that integrates MIE and electrical resistivity values along with process-specific information (e.g., quantity of dust handled, presence of ignition sources). The aim is to prioritize potentially hazardous substances in the plant for detailed safety evaluation. The advantages and limitations of the proposed flow chart are also discussed. • A simplified protocol enables early ignition risk assessment with minimal dust quantities. • Ignition Energy (IE) is proposed as a surrogate for MIE in preliminary screenings. • The method supports classification by process type and dust quantity. • Safety measures are tailored to the assessed risk level of each scenario. • The approach encourages broader adoption of dust testing in industry.

Journal of ElectrostaticsVol. 138
University of Insubria (IT), Roth and Rau (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Combustion and Detonation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.