Remote working and the new geography of local service spending

Abstract Remote working has rapidly become the new norm in many sectors, at least some of the time. Remote working changes where workers spend much of their time and the geographical location of demand, particularly for local personal services (LPS). Our main contribution is to systematically quantify this change for England and Wales using a new nationally representative survey of nearly 35,000 working‐age adults, which captures (pre‐pandemic) LPS spending while at work and permanent changes in remote working. On average, our work shows that neighbourhoods where people commute 20% less often experience a decline in LPS spending of 5%. There is a clear geographic pattern (the ‘donut’ effect) to these spending changes, but our granular analysis shows that they are uneven: large decreases in LPS demand are concentrated in a small number of city‐centre neighbourhoods, while increases in LPS demand around the periphery are more dispersed. Further analysis of neighbourhoods by geographical and sociodemographic characteristics shows that the least affluent are most likely to benefit the least from remote work, increasing inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote working and the new geography of local service spending

Jesse Matheson, James Rockey, Gianni De Fraja, Shivani Taneja et al.
1 citations
Economica
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
article

Remote working and the new geography of local service spending

Jesse Matheson, James Rockey, Gianni De Fraja, Shivani Taneja, Paul Mizen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Remote working has rapidly become the new norm in many sectors, at least some of the time. Remote working changes where workers spend much of their time and the geographical location of demand, particularly for local personal services (LPS). Our main contribution is to systematically quantify this change for England and Wales using a new nationally representative survey of nearly 35,000 working‐age adults, which captures (pre‐pandemic) LPS spending while at work and permanent changes in remote working. On average, our work shows that neighbourhoods where people commute 20% less often experience a decline in LPS spending of 5%. There is a clear geographic pattern (the ‘donut’ effect) to these spending changes, but our granular analysis shows that they are uneven: large decreases in LPS demand are concentrated in a small number of city‐centre neighbourhoods, while increases in LPS demand around the periphery are more dispersed. Further analysis of neighbourhoods by geographical and sociodemographic characteristics shows that the least affluent are most likely to benefit the least from remote work, increasing inequality.

EconomicaVol. 93(369)
University of Nottingham (GB), The King's College (US), King's College London (GB), University of Kent (GB), King's College School (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.