Migration should be a personal choice, not the only one - a reflection on scientific diasporas

A brain drain phenomenon, i.e., the migration of highly skilled professionals, has represented and still represents a severe loss of intellectual capital for Global South countries. Factors driving this migration include limited research infrastructure, funding constraints, political instability, and the lack of scientific career prospects in the Global South, and the consequences are multifaceted. While this can hinder local development in the Global South, it simultaneously enriches research ecosystems in the Global North, exacerbating existing global inequalities in science and technology. Under this scenario, scientific diasporas represent an effort to counterbalance the brain drain scenario through initiatives that aim to increase science and technology, which are led by self-organized expat professionals and scientists. While we can find some successful examples of international cooperation driven by scientific diasporas, without a proper organization and full participation of the governments of the countries of origin, scientific diasporas can become dysfunctional and can promote more migration upon training. We, five early-career scientists, discuss our perspectives and personal reflections on scientific diasporas. We describe three migration models of highly skilled professionals, starting with a brain drain model, scientific diaspora, and dysfunctional scientific diaspora, and provide some ideas to help the implementation of successful scientific diasporas. We believe that migration must be a personal decision seeking scientific growth and professional development, and not the only option we should have to pursue a fulfilling career in science.