Uncertainty of Object Points Monoplotted from Terrestrial Images

With monoplotting, object points can be reconstructed from a single oriented image if a reference surface of the captured scene is available. While used extensively in environmental sciences, prior approaches fall short of describing the uncertainty of the reconstructed points. In this paper, we estimate this monoplotting uncertainty using three different methods: i) Monte Carlo simulation, ii) unscented transform and iii) classical variance propagation with tangential approximation of the terrain. Our investigations are guided by two different use cases: i) For manually selected image points, the estimated uncertainty determines whether these monoplotted points are accurate enough for a subsequent research question (e.g. deriving glacier changes from historical terrestrial images). ii) Estimating the monoplotting uncertainty for each pixel of the whole image to get an overview of the expectable uncertainty, which will already be beneficial during the image orientation step. While for the first use case, the precision of the estimated uncertainty is crucial, the second use case requires a fast method. Furthermore, in both use cases, silhouettes must be considered because the estimates in their vicinity will not be valid. Therefore, we further investigate the derivation of silhouette masks, optimally exploiting the available information from the three different methods. For evaluation, we use a selected historical terrestrial image showing a glacier in the Alps around 1900, where, for the first use case, we manually digitised individual vertices of a glacier outline. Using the Monte Carlo estimates based on 1000 samples as reference, the results from the unscented transform are closer to those (14.1% RMS) than the ones from variance propagation (24.7% RMS). Despite this good result from the unscented transform, our recommendation for this use case is nevertheless the Monte Carlo simulation, thanks to the speed of existing ray-casting routines. However, for the second use case, where the monoplotting uncertainty is predicted for each pixel of the entire image to get a quick overview, the enormous amount of millions of ray-castings prohibits both Monte Carlo simulation and unscented transform. Here, we propose to use variance propagation because of its speed and still reasonable precision, yielding uncertainty estimates with an RMS of 7.8% in areas away from silhouettes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-025-00359-6
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty of Object Points Monoplotted from Terrestrial Images

Camillo Ressl, Norbert Pfeifer, Sebastian Mikolka-Flöry
PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Uncertainty of Object Points Monoplotted from Terrestrial Images

Camillo Ressl, Norbert Pfeifer, Sebastian Mikolka-Flöry
article en

Abstract

With monoplotting, object points can be reconstructed from a single oriented image if a reference surface of the captured scene is available. While used extensively in environmental sciences, prior approaches fall short of describing the uncertainty of the reconstructed points. In this paper, we estimate this monoplotting uncertainty using three different methods: i) Monte Carlo simulation, ii) unscented transform and iii) classical variance propagation with tangential approximation of the terrain. Our investigations are guided by two different use cases: i) For manually selected image points, the estimated uncertainty determines whether these monoplotted points are accurate enough for a subsequent research question (e.g. deriving glacier changes from historical terrestrial images). ii) Estimating the monoplotting uncertainty for each pixel of the whole image to get an overview of the expectable uncertainty, which will already be beneficial during the image orientation step. While for the first use case, the precision of the estimated uncertainty is crucial, the second use case requires a fast method. Furthermore, in both use cases, silhouettes must be considered because the estimates in their vicinity will not be valid. Therefore, we further investigate the derivation of silhouette masks, optimally exploiting the available information from the three different methods. For evaluation, we use a selected historical terrestrial image showing a glacier in the Alps around 1900, where, for the first use case, we manually digitised individual vertices of a glacier outline. Using the Monte Carlo estimates based on 1000 samples as reference, the results from the unscented transform are closer to those (14.1% RMS) than the ones from variance propagation (24.7% RMS). Despite this good result from the unscented transform, our recommendation for this use case is nevertheless the Monte Carlo simulation, thanks to the speed of existing ray-casting routines. However, for the second use case, where the monoplotting uncertainty is predicted for each pixel of the entire image to get a quick overview, the enormous amount of millions of ray-castings prohibits both Monte Carlo simulation and unscented transform. Here, we propose to use variance propagation because of its speed and still reasonable precision, yielding uncertainty estimates with an RMS of 7.8% in areas away from silhouettes.

PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Geoinformation ScienceVol. 93(6)
TU Wien (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.