Mercy – a Central Virtue in Animal Ethics

Abstract In ethical debates regarding modern technologies in livestock production, virtue ethics plays a subordinate role. We address this issue by providing a virtue ethical framework centered on mercy. First, we define mercy as a virtue, which applies when the moral agent can harm someone vulnerable and refrains from doing so. Second, we link mercy to empathic concern, which we argue to be crucial for virtue because it informs moral agents about pain in others and inhibits them from harming others. Drawing on an existing argument from military ethics about the viciousness of unlearning empathy in the case of soldiers learning to kill, we problematize animal slaughter. Third, we argue that a virtuous society promotes eudaimonia in its citizens and therefore should not require them to become merciless. We conclude that societies should not endorse practices that cultivate mercilessness, but encourage practices that increase mercy towards others, including farmed animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25889567-bja10067
Primary Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mercy – a Central Virtue in Animal Ethics

F.L.B. Meijboom, Koen Kramer, L. Borgdorf
Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
article

Mercy – a Central Virtue in Animal Ethics

F.L.B. Meijboom, Koen Kramer, L. Borgdorf
article en

Abstract

Abstract In ethical debates regarding modern technologies in livestock production, virtue ethics plays a subordinate role. We address this issue by providing a virtue ethical framework centered on mercy. First, we define mercy as a virtue, which applies when the moral agent can harm someone vulnerable and refrains from doing so. Second, we link mercy to empathic concern, which we argue to be crucial for virtue because it informs moral agents about pain in others and inhibits them from harming others. Drawing on an existing argument from military ethics about the viciousness of unlearning empathy in the case of soldiers learning to kill, we problematize animal slaughter. Third, we argue that a virtuous society promotes eudaimonia in its citizens and therefore should not require them to become merciless. We conclude that societies should not endorse practices that cultivate mercilessness, but encourage practices that increase mercy towards others, including farmed animals.

Journal of Applied Animal Ethics ResearchVol. 7(2)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.