The Non-Arbitrability of Employment Disputes in India: Analysing the Supreme Court’s Evolving Jurisprudence and the Transformative Impact of the Labour Codes

This paper analyzes the fundamental transformation of employment dispute resolution in India between 2024 and 2025, driven by critical judicial mandate and statutory reform. The research confirms that the Indian legal system has definitively subordinated private contractual autonomy to statutory labor protections, thereby narrowing the scope of employment arbitration significantly. Specifically, the Supreme Court of India established a clear jurisdictional boundary in its 2024 ruling, confirming that disputes concerning non-payment of wages (Payment of Wages Act, 1936) and the legality of termination (Industrial Disputes Act, 1947) are non-arbitrable, vesting exclusive jurisdiction in specialized statutory authorities.1 Concurrently, the implementation of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (IR Code), structurally excludes the application of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act), for industrial disputes, substituting it with a specialized, state-regulated regime requiring mandatory administrative filing of the arbitration agreement within 30 days of execution.3 This dual shift necessitates an immediate and comprehensive overhaul of corporate employment dispute mechanisms, treating core labor rights as non-derogable public policy matters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.57454
Primary Topic
International Labor and Employment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Non-Arbitrability of Employment Disputes in India: Analysing the Supreme Court’s Evolving Jurisprudence and the Transformative Impact of the Labour Codes

Isha Amin
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
International Labor and Employment Law
article

The Non-Arbitrability of Employment Disputes in India: Analysing the Supreme Court’s Evolving Jurisprudence and the Transformative Impact of the Labour Codes

Isha Amin
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes the fundamental transformation of employment dispute resolution in India between 2024 and 2025, driven by critical judicial mandate and statutory reform. The research confirms that the Indian legal system has definitively subordinated private contractual autonomy to statutory labor protections, thereby narrowing the scope of employment arbitration significantly. Specifically, the Supreme Court of India established a clear jurisdictional boundary in its 2024 ruling, confirming that disputes concerning non-payment of wages (Payment of Wages Act, 1936) and the legality of termination (Industrial Disputes Act, 1947) are non-arbitrable, vesting exclusive jurisdiction in specialized statutory authorities.1 Concurrently, the implementation of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (IR Code), structurally excludes the application of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act), for industrial disputes, substituting it with a specialized, state-regulated regime requiring mandatory administrative filing of the arbitration agreement within 30 days of execution.3 This dual shift necessitates an immediate and comprehensive overhaul of corporate employment dispute mechanisms, treating core labor rights as non-derogable public policy matters.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
International Labor and Employment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.